About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

60 Docket 1 (2012)

handle is hein.journals/dock60 and id is 1 raw text is: 










BUFFALO LAW REVIEW

          THE DOCKET


   VOLUME 60            APRIL 2012           PAGES 1-11

      Meaningful Information, Meaningful
                       Retention

                    JORDAN M. SINGERt

    Judicial retention elections are at a crossroads. Less
than twenty years ago, they were seen as relatively sleepy
affairs, characterized by low voter turnout and little or no
campaigning. But times have changed. In 2010, high court
judges in six states were targeted for non-retention by well-
organized and well-financed opposition groups with overtly
political agendas.1 Although these efforts mostly proved
unsuccessful, anti-retention forces appear to be gaining
resilience with each election cycle.2 Once heralded as a
relatively   apolitical  means     of   ensuring   judicial
accountability, retention elections now face an uncertain
future.
    In his recent Article, Professor Todd Pettys suggests
that we may have reached a breaking point.3 Briefly
summarized, his contention is this: modern anti-retention
campaigns are particularly powerful because they are able
to tap into voters' moral outrage over controversial court


t Assistant Professor of Law, New England Law   Boston. I am grateful to
Tigran Eldred, Lawrence Friedman, and Louis Schulze for helpful comments on
earlier drafts.
   1. See Roy A. Schotland, Iowa's 2010 Judicial Election: Appropriate
Accountability or Rampant Passion?, 46 CT. REV. 118, 118 (2010).
   2. See ADAM SKAGGS ET AL., THE NEW POLITICS OF JUDICIAL ELECTIONS 2009-
10, at 27 (2011) (More assaults on impartial courts, taking a range of different
forms, are on the horizon.).
   3. Todd E. Pettys, Judicial Retention Elections, the Rule of Law, and the
Rhetorical Weaknesses of Consequentialism, 60 BUFF. L. REV. 69, 78 (2012).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most