About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

43 Crime L. & Soc. Change 1 (2005)

handle is hein.journals/crmlsc43 and id is 1 raw text is: Crime, Law & Social Change (2005) 43: 1-29
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-005-2488-y                         © Springer 2005
Control fraud as an explanation for white-collar crime waves:
The case of the savings and loan debacle
W. BLACK
Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, PO. Box 78713,
Austin, USA (e-mail: b. black@ mail. utexas.edu)
Introduction: Control frauds and the S&L debacle
Economists and white-collar criminologists tend to come from opposite ends
of the political spectrum, so it should not be a surprise that their views on
the relative importance of white-collar crime in general and the role of white-
collar crime in the savings and loan debacle of the 1980s should be polar.
Economists tend to view fraud as being of marginal importance in general,
and distracts policy makers trying to prevent future crises.1
One scholar who specializes in law and economics, Professor Daniel
Fischel of the University of Chicago's School of Law, has written articles and
books that reflect the conventional wisdom of many economists about these
subjects. The title of his 1995 book, Payback: The Conspiracy to Destroy
Michael Milken and His Financial Revolution, conveys both the thesis and
the polemical style of the argument. While Payback deals primarily with
Milken and the investment banking firm he became synonymous with, Drexel,
Burnham & Lambert, it also discusses the S&L debacle at some length and
argues that, as with Milken, the government sought to grossly exaggerate the
role of fraud in the debacle.
In the course of Payback, Fischel asks the question that this article is
intended to answer:
Why was there a sudden simultaneous explosion of fraud and criminality
at savings and loans across the country? Did a new generation of morally
depraved thrift operators just coincidentally appear at the same time.2
Professor Fischel intended these questions to be rhetorical and sarcastic, he
believed they exposed the fact that: The government's simple fraud and
insider-abuse explanation for the thrift crisis defied common sense (Id).
This article answers Professor Fischel's questions. There was a sudden
explosion of criminality because a series of factors came together to create a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most