About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

34 Crim. L.F. 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/crimlfm34 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Criminal Law Forum (2023) 34:1-41 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-022-09450-8

                          JOHN  QUIGLEY*



 PROHIBITION OF PALESTINE ARAB RETURN TO ISRAEL
              AS  A  CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

         Accepted: 3 December 2022; Published online: 15 February 2023


ABSTRACT. A displaced   population of Palestine Arabs, numbering over seven
million, is dispersed around the world, with major concentrations in Lebanon,
Jordan, Syria, and Palestine itself. This population is prohibited from entry for
renewed residence in home areas situated in Israel. In international law a right of
return to one's country is guaranteed as a matter of fundamental rights. Severe
deprivation of internationally defined rights victimizing a civilian population based
on ethnicity or nationality constitutes the crime of persecution, a sub-category of
crimes against humanity, prosecutable at the International Criminal Court. With
respect to a major portion of the displaced Palestine Arabs, jurisdictional prereq-
uisites obtain for the opening of an investigation that might lead to charges against
Israeli officials responsible for denying return to the Palestine Arabs.



                     I   SCOPE OF ANALYSIS

In 2011, Israel's Prime Minister  Benjamin  Netanyahu,   in a speech  to
the US  Congress,  declared  that 'the Palestinian refugee problem  will
be resolved  outside the borders  of Israel'.1 That statement  was con-
sistent with a practice Israel has followed since the departure in 1948
of the majority of the Arab  population  from  the segment  of Palestine
over  which  Israel gained  control  in that year.  The  prohibition  of
return to the displaced  Arabs  of Palestine (to whom   we  will refer as
'the Palestine Arabs') has  been  condemned   in regard  to the respon-
sibility of Israel as a state.2 The question arises whether Israeli offi-
cials who implement   the policy thereby commit   a crime that could be
prosecuted  at the International  Criminal  Court  (ICC).
   This question will be addressed by examining ICC jurisdiction and how
it applies in this situation. The ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute only for

  * John Quigley is Professor Emeritus, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State
University, Columbus. E-mail: quigley.2@osu.edu.
   US  Congress, 157 Congressional Record 72, at H3350, 24 May 2011.
   2 See, eg, Assistance to Palestine refugees, UN General Assembly Res. 76/77, 9
September 2021 noting that repatriation ('has not yet been effected'). And see Sec-
tion VI infra.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most