About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 J. Corp. L. Stud. 1 (2007)

handle is hein.journals/corplstd7 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Journal of Corporate Law Studies


       WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OF
                        CORPORATE GOVERNANCE?


                                MARC GOERGEN*


       Over the last few years, national and international regulators have taken conscious steps to
       make capital markets-especially those based in Europe-more shareholder-oriented. On one
       side, these are welcome initiatives as the recent spectacular corporate failures and anecdotal
       evidence suggest that managers' attitudes definitely need to change and more weight needs to be
       given to shareholders' concerns. On the other side, there is as yet vegy little research on the
       benefits and shortcomings of alternative systems of corporate governance. Evidencefrom thefew
       existing studies is inconclusive as to whether there is an optimal system of corporate governance
       and whether such a system already exists in a particular country. The move in one particular
       direction may therefore be far too premature. Further, some of my own research suggests that
       vegy similar changes in regulation such as changes in takeover regulation-may have very
       different outcomes depending on the initial corporate ownership and control that prevail in a
       given country.



                                 A. INTRODUCTION

The generally accepted definition of corporate governance is that of Andrei
Shleifer from Harvard Business School and Robert Vishny from the University
of Chicago. According to their definition, corporate governance deals with the
ways in which suppliers of finance to corporations assure themselves of getting a
return on their investment.' They justify the focus on shareholders by stating
that, contrary to other stakeholders, the former have a sunk investment in the
company If the firm runs into financial difficulties, shareholders are likely to lose
their investment, whereas other stakeholders such as employees can walk away
relatively easily
   The OECD, the World Bank, the European Association of Securities Dealers
(the EASD) and the European Commission have adopted the essence of Shleifer


* The University of Sheffield Management School, Sheffield, UK, and European Corporate
   Governance Institute (ECGI), Brussels, Belgium. This paper is based on my inaugural lecture at
   the University of Sheffield on 22 February 2006. I am grateful to Eilis Ferran (the editor), an
   anonymous referee, Brian Cheffins, Luc Renneboog and Suzette Rouch-Cordot for comments
   and suggestions that have helped to improve this paper.
I A Shleifer and R Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance (1997) 52 Journal of Finance 737.


April 2007

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most