About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

14 Const. Pol. Econ. 3 (2003)

handle is hein.journals/constpe14 and id is 1 raw text is: LA                Constitutional Political Economy, 14, 3-21, 2003.
W    © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in The Netherlands.
The Place of Indigenous Institutions in
Constitutional Order'
SUJAI J. SHIVAKUMAR2,3
The National Academies, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington DC 20418
Abstract. The failure of the state in Africa and elsewhere, and its attendant conflict, is rooted in the lack of
correspondence between indigenous institutions and the formal structures of the state. Indigenous institutions, as
have variously evolved, represent sets of practices and expectations that can be distinctive to problems of
collective action faced by groups of individuals in their own exigent circumstances. By developing a community
of understanding tuned to these circumstances, they provide the rules and grammar within which individuals
perceive their actions and those of others. They thus each represent a facility within which a person can use his or
her knowledge of time and place and his or her understanding of others in the group in resolving collective action
problems. In order to overcome the pathologies of state failure, societies should be constituted with reference to
these indigenous political resources. As such, constitutional rules should both link such systems of collective
action and set out the terms by which they develop.
JEL classification: HO, 017, P0.
1. The Relevance of Indigenous Institutions
Indigenous institutions can represent locally meaningful solutions to problems of collec-
tive action4 confronting individuals in the various particular environments they inhabit. By
providing specialized rules as tools to address peculiar problems related to the exigencies
of time and place, they can forestall and resolve conflict, foster coordination and
cooperation in jointly undertaken activities, and promote reconciliation of varied interests.
Given that the improvement of human well-being rests on the realization of adaptive
potentials, and given that problems of collective action must be overcome in this regard,
the nature of indigenous institutions and their place within a broader constitutional context
is critical in addressing issues of economic progress and human development.
Nevertheless, indigenous institutions are relevant to conflict resolution, reconciliation,
and development, not so much because they, in some cases, represent ready-made or
locally evolved solutions to problems of collective action, but rather because they reflect
fundamental understandings among affected individuals, who must deal with each other
within the context of a particular problem arena on how to overcome dilemmas of
collective action. These understandings relate to how each person conceives of his or her
contribution within the array of relationships that secure a problem-solving community.
Institutions, as nexuses of such cognizance, serve to bind a community of understanding;
they create, within the minds of each member of the community, bounds for rational action
and expectations on how to relate to the other in solving problems collectively. In this
respect, any initiative deemed necessary to improve patterns of development or conflict

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most