About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

32 Comm. Law. 1 (2016-2017)

handle is hein.journals/comlaw32 and id is 1 raw text is: 
COVER   STORY
First Circuit Court of Appeals
Holds  that Communications
Decency  Act  Bars Action
Claiming  that Website Facilitated
Sex Trafficking ....................... 1

FTC  Seeks  to Sharpen Blurred
Lines with Guidance  on Native
Advertising ................................... 4

In (Partial) Defense of Internet
Trolls: Advocating a Flexible
Summary   Judgment   Standard
before Unmasking   Anonymous
Commentators Accused of
Defam  ation................................... 9

Demystifying  the Law on  Opinion
and  Embracing  Milkovich  ....... 15

Proportionality: Finally, A Tool to
Help Media  Defendants  Achieve
Rule 1's Promise........................ 24

The  Continuing Relevance  of
National Archives and  Records
Administration  v. Favish in an Era
of Violence ...................2........ 28

July 4, 1966: Birth of the FOIA -A
Look  Back .................................. 34

Courtside .................................... 43


First Circuit Court of A ppeals


Holds that Communications


Decency Act Brs cto


C   laiming that Website


Facilitated Sex Trafficking

ROBERT  L. ROGERS  III


    n March  the First Circuit Court
    of Appeals issued an important
    decision that upholds the robust
    iunmunity afforded to website
operators under the Communications
Decency Act (CDA), through its affir-
matice of the dismissal of an action
by rape victims seeking damages
from Backpage.com  under the federal
Trafficking Victims Protection Reau-
thorization Act (TVPRA). At a time
when even Backpage is contending
with different results involving simi-
lar claims in other courts.' the First
Circuit in Jane Doe No. I v. Backpage.
corn2 critically affirms that web-
sites cannot be liable for the tortious
conduct of their users, even if they
facilitate such conduct through their
user rules and even if the tortious
conduct is particularly deplorable.

Claims Asserted by Sex Trafficking
Victims Against Backpage.com
   As the First Circuit noted, [t]
his is a hard case ... whose circum-
stances evoke outrage. Jane Doe No.
I involves disturbine claims about
online sex trafficking that led to


Robert L. Rogers, III is a Senior Counsel
with Holland & Knight LLP and works in
the flin's Orlando offie.


thousands of rapes of three teenage
women.4 The three plintiffs alleged
that sex trafficking pimps purchased
or forced them to purchase online ads
promoting them for escort services
from Backpage com, a website that
sells online classified advertising.
   Based on these allegations, the
victims asserted a claim aaatist Back-
page under the civil remedy provision
of the IVPRA. which authorizes a
civil suit against anyone who know-
ingly benefits, fi nancially or by
receiving anything of value from par-
ticipation in a venture which that
person knew or should have known
was engaged in sex trafficking.6
   The CDA  generally immunizes
websites from liability for injuries
caused to their users by other users.
For example, the CDA inmunizes
websites from liability for defama-
tory statements posted by others by
prohibiting providers of interactive
computer services from being treated
as the publisher or speaker of any
information provided by another
information content provider. The
CDA  further immunizes website oper-
ators from actions seeking to impose
liability for their exercise of a pub-
lisher's traditional editorial functions,

             (Continued on page 37)


Published in Communications Lawyer, V!lume 32, Number 1, Winter 2016. @ 2016 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. Al! rights reserved.
This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system
without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.


        Publication of the Forum
        on Communications Law
        American Bar Association
Volume 32, Number 1, Winter 2016

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most