About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

5 Crim. Just. Pol'y Rev. 1 (1991)

handle is hein.journals/cjpr5 and id is 1 raw text is: CJPR, VOL. 5, NO. 1/91, pp. 1-16 ©IUP Drug Testing: Constitutional And Policy Implications Ernest Giglio Lycoming College Abstract Let us assume the following three scenarios. Scenario one involves a professional football player who tests positive for drugs for the third time and under National Football League rules is suspended indefinitely. The second scenario concerns a railroad engineer whose urinalysis sample taken after a serious accident reveals drug usage and who is subsequently dismissed from his Conrail job. The final scenario includes a recent college graduate who applies for a position with a Fortune 500 company but does not get the job because she fails the required pre-employment drug test. What do these three people share in common? They all tested positive for drug use and suffered economic loss, and possibly psychological pain, as a consequence. But were their rights violated? Was their privacy intruded upon? Was the testing procedure fair and accurate? Did the testing violate the American legal principle that guilt is individual rather than collective? These are some of the questions raised by government-mandated, as well as employer-required, drug testing. As courts and legislative bodies wrestle with these questions, the policy consequences of their decisions and enact- ments need to be considered. This paper purports to examine the constitutional issues raised by drug testing, how the courts have resolved them, and the policy implications that have resulted from their actions. Nature And Scope Of The Problem The threshold question in any discussion related to drug testing is whether, in fact, the United States has a drug problem of such magnitude that mandatory drug testing is required to control it? The proponents of drug testing maintain that drug abuse is a serious social and economic problem. However, no government agency or statistical bureau knows with any degree of certitude Aversion of this paperwas presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association, San Antonio, Texas, March 27-30, 1991.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most