About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

45 Crime & Delinquency 3 (1999)

handle is hein.journals/cadq45 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Reconsidering Restorative Justice:
The Corruption of Benevolence Revisited?



      Sharon   Levrant
      Francis   T. Cullen
      Betsy  Fulton
      John  F. Wozniak


      Restorative justice has emerged as an increasingly popular correctional paradigm that
      is drawing support not only from conservatives but also from liberals. Although this
      approach has value, its ready embrace as a progressive reform ispotentiallyproblematic
      in two respects. First, the risk exists that restorative justice programs will be corrupted to
      serve nonprogressive goals and thus do more harm than good. Second, there is little rea-
      son to anticipate that restorative justice programs will have a meaningful effect on
      offender recidivism. Thus, restorative justice should be viewed and implemented with
      caution.
      Three decades  have passed since the rehabilitative agenda was pushed
aside for crime control policies rooted in a get tough philosophy. This ori-
entation has led to harsh forms of punishment, including a dramatic increase
in incarceration, the passage of three strikes and you're out laws, the rein-
statement   of the death  penalty,  and  a return  to chain  gangs.  Even
community-based sanctions   are unabashedly  fierce, emphasizing rigorous
surveillance and  the enforcement  of increasingly  stringent conditions of
supervision (Clear and Hardyman   1990, p. 46). Clear (1994, p. 3) character-
izes this growth in the levels of punishment as a penal harm movement jus-
tified by both a retributive philosophy of inflicting deserved pain on offend-
ers and the utilitarian arguments of deterrence and incapacitation.
   It is tempting to portray the penal harm movement as   having  achieved
complete  hegemony   over correctional policies. To be sure, it is a powerful
way  of thinking with which few policy makers publicly take issue. Still, penal
harm  ideology has undermined  but not stamped out alternative perspectives.

SHARON   LEVRANT:  Ph.D. Student, University of Cincinnati. FRANCIS T. CULLEN: Dis-
tinguished Research Professor of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati. BETSY FULTON:
Ph.D. Student, University of Cincinnati. JOHN F. WOZNIAK: Associate Professor of Sociol-
ogy, Western Illinois University.
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, Vol. 45 No. 1, January 1999 3-27
@ 1999 Sage Publications, Inc.
                                                                          3


from the SAGE Social Science Collections. All Rights Reserved.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most