About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

33 Atuacao 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/atuacao33 and id is 1 raw text is: Chrystopher Augusto Danielski Especialista na Carreira do Ministerio Publico Promotor de Justiga do Ministerio Publico de Santa Catarina RESUMO: Nos feitos de natureza penal, e comum que a autoridade policial venha a se deparar com vestigios biol6gicos capazes de apontar a autoria do delito. A titulo exemplificativo, podem-se citar semen em crimes sexuais, celulas do agressor sob as unhas da vitima ou mesmo sangue do delinquente ao tentar se evadir pela vidraga de uma moradia. Contudo, diante de um alargamento interpretativo, extremado do principio da presuncao de inocencia, he grande dificuldade em se proceder ao cotejo entre eventual material genetico encontrado e a pessoa do investigado, tudo sob a justificativa da protecso que the e dada em nao produzir prova contra si, revestindo-o com um escudo de impunidade. Em tal cenerio, busca-se estabelecer diferenciacao entre a produso de prova autoincriminat6ria e a tolerancia de prova, esta Oltima, entende-se, contornada pelos limites constitucionais. Palavras-chave: Principio da presuncao de nao culpabilidade. Extrac8o compuls6ria de material genetico para fins penais. Tolerancia de prova. ABSTRACT: In criminal proceedings, it is common for the police authority to come across biological traces that may point to the offender. As an example, one can mention semen in sexual crimes, aggressor cells under the victim's nails or even the offender's blood when trying to escape through a window. However, in view of an interpretative widening and exacerbation of the principle of presumption of innocence, there is great difficulty in comparing any genetic material found and the suspect, due to the protection given to one so as not to produce evidence against oneself, which covers one with an impunity shield. In such a scenario, we seek to distinguish the production of self-incriminating evidence and the tolerance of evidence, the latter being understood as circumvented by constitutional limits. Keywords: Principle of presumption of innocence. Compulsory extraction of genetic material for criminal ends. Tolerance of evidence.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most