About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

28 Atuacao 1 (2018)

handle is hein.journals/atuacao28 and id is 1 raw text is: AVOS PODEM ADOTAR NETOS? ATIVISMO JUDICIAL E LIMITES DA LEGALIDADE: ANALISE CRITICA DO JULGAMENTO DO RESP 1.448.969/SC PELO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTI A CAN GRANDPARENTS ADOPT GRANDCHILDREN? JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND LIMITS OF THE LEGALITY: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TRIAL RESP 1.448.969/SC BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Jo~o Luiz de Carvalho Botega Promotor de Justiga Mestre em Cincia Juridica pela Universidade do Vale do Itajai RESUMO: 0 artigo propbe-se a analisar criticamente um julgado proferido pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiga no ano de 2014 (REsp n. 1.448.969/SC), em que a referida Corte autorizou a adogo pelos ascendentes do adotando, nqo obstante a exist~ncia de expressa proibigo legal (ECA, artigo 42, § 10). Sqo problematizados, entqo, 6 luz das categorias da legalidade estrita e do ativismo judicial, os fundamentos juridicos invocados e utilizados no voto do Ministro relator, verificando-se se esses fundamentos se sustentarn em um exame critico a partir de crit~rios de integridade e coer~ncia ou se na verdade se trata de argumentos ret6ricos ou ad hoc para justificar uma decisqo solipsista, incompativel corn o Estado Democrtico de Direito. Trata-se, pois, de um artigo sobre Teoria do Direito e nqo sobre Direito da Crianga e do Adolescente. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Legalidade estrita. Ativismo judicial. Positivismo. REsp n. 1.448.969/SC. ABSTRACT: The paper aims to critically analyze a trial ruled by the Superior Court of Justice in 2014 (REsp n. 1.448.969/SC) in which that Court authorized the adoption by the ancestors of the adopted, despite the existence of an express legal prohibition (ECA, article 42, § 10). The legal grounds used in the vote of the judge (Minister) are then problematized, in the light of the categories of strict legality and judicial activism, in order to verify if they are sustained on a critical examination based on criteria of integrity and coherence or if they are in fact rhetorical or ad hoc arguments to justify a solipsistic decision, incompatible with the democratic state. This is, therefore, a paper about the theory of Law and not about the rights of children and adolescents. KEYWORDS: Strict legality. Judicial activism. Positivism. REsp n. 1.448.969/SC. Atuaco: Rev. Jur. do Min. Ptibl Catarin., Florianopois, v. 13, n. 28, p. 1-24, jun./nov. 2018.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most