About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

61 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/amcrimlr61 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                             ARTICLES


  THE  EXTRAVAGANCE OF EIGHTH AMENDMENT DEFERENCE

Daniel Loehr*

                                  ABSTRACT

   We live in an era of extremely long prison sentences, visibly excruciating exe-
cutions, and violence-plagued prisons. We also live in an era of penological judi-
cial restraint, which manifests through the practice of deference, wherein courts
put a thumb on  the scale in favor of finding laws and policies constitutional. On
this basis, courts have been reluctant to use the Eighth Amendment's  ban  on
cruel and usual punishments to invalidate even some of the most extreme features
of our criminal legal system.
   This Article traces the profound effect of deference on the construction and
application of the Eighth Amendment.  To  do so, this Article also assesses the
meanings  of cruelty and unusualness, as well as the logic of deference. What we
learn from these inquiries is that deference can corrode and confuse the meaning
of our rights. In the Eighth Amendment context, deference has also undermined
some  of the Civil War's fundamental legal achievements, including the ability of
individuals to seek protection under federal constitutional law against state-
imposed forced  labor and deprivations of freedom. But deference need not cor-
rode the Eighth Amendment  in this way. A better rendering of deference, and the
Eighth Amendment,  is possible.


INTRODUCTION    .............................................               2
  I.  THE INFLUENCE OF DEFERENCE . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
      A.   The Predecessors of Deference .......................            4
      B.   General Sentence Review  ...........................             6
      C.   General Death Penalty Review  .......................           10
      D.   Exception-Based Review  ............................            11
      E.   Prison Conditions ................................              13
 II.  A TYPOLOGY  OF DEFERENCE . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
      A.   Modes  of Deference ...............................             15
           1.  Absolute Deference  ............................        15

  * Clinical Lecturer in Law, Yale Law School. Barry Friedman, Maria Ponomarenko, and Kenji Yoshino
provided invaluable guidance during the early stages of this project. Balen Essak-Hernandez and Yixuan Liu
offered critical feedback as it neared completion. The editors of the American Criminal Law Review worked
quickly and carefully to make the writing more coherent and the citations more robust. For all of this support, I
am deeply grateful. © 2024, Daniel Loehr.


1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most