About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

94 N.C. L. Rev. Addendum 1 (2015-2016)

handle is hein.journals/addendum94 and id is 1 raw text is: 

94 N.C. L. REV. ADDENDUM 1 (2015)


The Root Canal of Antitrust Immunity: North Carolina State
Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC*


                            INTRODUCTION
     Esse quam videri.' North Carolina adopted this Latin phrase,
which means to be rather than to seem, as its motto in 1893.2 The
Supreme Court of the United States has now held the state to that
standard in its recent decision, North Carolina State Board of Dental
Examiners v. FTC.' In Dental Examiners, a case questioning whether
a professional dental board is liable for engaging in anticompetitive
action when it sent cease-and-desist letters to non-dentists performing
teeth whitening, the Court held that a professional dental board
lacking active state supervision is not immune from lawsuits
challenging its anticompetitive behavior.' In order to receive state
action immunity5 from antitrust litigation, known commonly as
Parker immunity, a licensing board must be a state agency acting
for the state rather than merely seeming to be a state agency while
acting in pursuit of its own, competitive interests. The state must be
actively supervising the board, rather than allowing the board to seem
to be acting as the state.6
     Professional licensing boards are groups charged with the
licensing and regulating of a particular practice by state statute.7 For
instance, the state bar regulates the practice of lawyers, while the


    * © 2015 Kate Ortbahn.
    1. Jessica Lee Thompson, Esse Quam Videri, N.C. HIST. PROJECT, http://www
.northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/402/entry [http://perma.cc/JM6C-PNBJ].
    2. Id. The motto originates from a sentence in Cicero's On Friendship. It reads:
Virtute enim ipsa non tam multi praediti esse quam videri volunt, which translates to
not nearly so many people want actually to be possessed of virtue as want to appear to be
possessed of it. Id.
    3. 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015).
    4. Id. at 1117.
    5. The immunity comes from Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). See infra Part I.
    6. See generally Dental Examiners, 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015).
    7. Rebecca Haw Allensworth & Aaron Edlin, Letting Dentists Feel the Bite of
Competition, WALL ST. J. (Mar. 8, 2015, 6:54 PM), http://www.wsj.com/articles/rebecca-
haw-allensworth-and-aaron-edin-letting-dentists-fee-the-bite-f-cmpetitin-1425855260
[http://perma.cc/U4TC-GB2F (dark archive)]; see, e.g., N.C. GEN. STAT. § 55B-2 (2013)
(defining licensing board); Dental Examiners, 135 S. Ct. at 1107 (citing N.C. GEN. STAT.
§§ 90-29 to 90-41 (2013)) (The Board's principal duty is to create, administer, and enforce
a licensing system for dentists.).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most