About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

104-10149-10001 JFK Assassination Records Archives 1 (1/29/1979)

handle is hein.jfk/jfkarch40336 and id is 1 raw text is: CONF00DENT AL COMMENTS ON HSCA REPORTS RECEIVED 26 JANUARY 1979 This new package consists of two drafts, one is a 14 page draft concerning a Cuban-American, followed by footnotes. The other is a discussion of whether Oswald had any CIA or other connections; the pagination of thi.s draft was uncertain and I re-numbered the pages, totalling 108 in all. (U) I. Cuban-American This draft shows the HSCA attempt to sanitize. They have designated LITEMPO/4 to be deleted. They have proposed to delete the word City in order to change .Mexico City Station into a more general Mexico Station. The Warren Commission report, I think, makes some reference to it so we may have a problem on how to handle it. These references recur on pages 3-5. References to the Monterray Base, also to be deleted, appear on pages 5 and 6. The name of the subject of the report. Lopez, appears on every page of this section from page 2 on. We should consider whether we object to this. (C) While LITEMPO/4 is indicated for deletion, LIFIRE is not (see pages 2, 3, and 4). Does this make any difference or should we request the same treatment as given LITEMPO? (C) Does the references on page 4 to a photograph of Lopez really compromise anything? There are further references on page 4. More specific references on page 3 are marked for deletion. (C) What is the reference on page 6 to LAM/Fl? (U) On page 7 there is talk about FBI information on Lopez. While we haven't a direct interest in FBI material, this does relate to the subject which takes us back to the original question of whether we object giving the name of Lopez. (C) On page 10 CIA's not giving the Warren Commission information on Lopez is described as egregious. While.we think the report that first seemed to give him significance is a very poor report, the HSCA view is that we should have passed it on anyway. We can say.that CIA did what intelligence agencies always do, evaluate the report and not disseminate it if it doesn't have merit, but I don't think that argument would go very far. I am inclined to not take exception to the HSCA description

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most