About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

777 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 1 (1962)

handle is hein.intprop/uspagaz0664 and id is 1 raw text is: OFFICIAL GAZETTE
April 3, 1962

+ UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE

Volume 777

Number 1

PATENTS
NOTICES

Survey Report
The following letter is being published at
the writer and with my concurrence.

Mar. 14, 1962.

DAVID L.
Commissioner
Earl W. K
Federal B
1815 H St
Washingto

Honorable DAvID L. LAND,
Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent Office,
14th and E Streets N.W.,
Washington 25, D.C.
Dear Commissioner Ladd:
As you know, at the beginning of our sur
Office Operations we asked the patent practito
comments, advice and guidance. Their respon
tionnaire was outstandingly good. Many of t
and suggestions were found to be among the v
were developed and investigated during the
only mention a few of them in this letter, but
ments were carefully considered, coded and
many of them are treated in great detail in on
ment survey report to you. All the response
mitted to you with the final report.
There is a general feeling among the pra¢
the examiners are doing about as well as they c
to do under very difficult conditions. They m
ments about physical facilities. One of the ii
comments involved the need for facilities for
the various examining divisions. Many attor
larly those from out of town, felt that added
facilities were needed and that as a minimum
that the Patent Office has should be more equi
tered, e.g., prevent some attorneys from un
desk space in the search room while interview
in divisions. There is substantial support for a
for separate rooms for each examiner, air cot
chanical aids such as readers in the Search R
tion of industry in classification, formalizin
examiner records, etc.
A major complaint is that service on orders
reproductions is too slow. Very strong word
tioners indicates the need for immediate aetio
Specific recommendations following the thinkin
neys are included in the Management Survey re
Most of the comments about examiners go t
experience and proficiency in technical fields o
salaries, better training, and similar improvem
tioned frequently.  It was urged that decisl
based on substantive merits with minimum us

law. They also felt that experienced examiners should have
greater freedom from review. An objective review of issued
the request of patents was suggested by some to secure a higher standard
of patentability.
LADD,           A large number of recommendations were made to improve
of Patents.   patent practice. Many of them are included in the report.
Increased use of interviews and of telephone contacts were
urged. Added clerical and typing help was a frequent sug-
gestion. It was also felt that the Office should respond
intner,        immediately to the attorney's response following a shortened
ar Building,   period.
reet N.W.,       A number of respondents suggested that the Office prepare
n, D.C.        and publish guideline and instructional material on the prep-
aration of good applications, amendments, etc.    More
prompt action on appeals and interferences were firmly rec-
ommended. There were also recommendations that attorneys
should be allowed more time to present cases at hearings and
that decisions should then be made immediately following the
vey of Patent hearing.  In addition, a simplification of the interference
oners for their practice was deemed essential.
se to our ques-  Obviously, if you find the report helpful to you, it can be
heir comments said with certainty that much of the credit is due those who
cry best which practice before the Office and who were so generous of their
survey. I can time in giving us such careful comments and suggestions.
all such com-   Since it is not feasible for me to acknowledge every response
evaluated and I would appreciate it if you would join with me In thanking
r full manage- those who responded by publishing this letter in the Official
es will be sub- Gazette.
Sincerely yours,
etitioners that                                  EARL W. KINTNER.
an be expected
ade many com-
fost numerous                     Industrial Property
interviews in
rneys, particu- MONTHLY REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU FOR THE
public search            PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
n the facilities
itably adminis-   The International Bureau for the Protection of Industrial
duly reserving Property, established under Article 13 of the Convention for
ring examiners the Protection of Industrial Property (see 775 O.G. 321, Feb-
new building, ruary 13, 1962), has been publishing a monthly journal, in
nditioning, me- French, called La Propridtd Industrielle. With the number
toom, Coopera- for January 1962, the Bureau has begun the publication of an
g of unofficial English edition, called Industrial Property. This journal
publishes official notices and texts relating to treaties, notices
for copies and of international conferences and meetings, translations of
ing by practi- new laws and amendments, statistics, and some articles, deci-
n in this area. sions, and book reviews, in the field of patents, trademarks
g of the attor- and unfair competition. The annual subscription is 33 Swiss
sport.         francs for the regular edition and 40 Swiss francs for a
to the issue of special edition printed on one side of the sheets. All inquiries
of art. Higher should be addressed to the International Bureau for the
ents were men- Protection of Industrial Property, Geneva, Switzerland.
ons should he                                        C. A. KALK,
se of points of Mar. 9, 1962.               Director of Administration.

New Applications Received During February 1962
Patents --------------------------------------- 6,196
Designs --------------------------------------- 427
Plant Patents ---------------------------------   4
Reissues    -------------------------------------- 19
Total ----------------------------------- 6,646

Issue
Patents ---- 1043-No. 3,027,558 to No. 3,028,600, icl.
Designs ------  60-No. 192,493 to No. 192,552, Incl.
Reissues -----   6--No.   25,148 to No.  25,153, Incl.

Total ---- 1109

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most