About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

425 Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 1 (1932)

handle is hein.intprop/uspagaz0425 and id is 1 raw text is: Patents Nos. 1,889,739 to 1,890,441 THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE EI 0ith states atet Offict Vol. 425-No. 1 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1932 Price-816 per year The OFFICIAL GAZETTE is mailed under the direction of the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, to whom all subscriptions should be made payable and all communications respecting the Gazette should be addressed. Issued weekly. Subscriptions, $16.00 per annum, including annual index, $18.25; single numbers. 85 cents each. PLNTED COPIES OF PATENTS are furnished by the Patent Office at 10 cents each. For the latter, address the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C. CIRCULARS OF GENERAL INFORMATION concerning PATENTS or concerning TRADE-MARKS. PRINTS, and LABELS will be sent without cost on request to the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C. CO NT E NTS IsuuE o DECEMBER 6, 1932.....-----.................... ADJUDICATED PATENTS---. - --- --............................. INTE PTERENCE NoTICE s...- .....-- .- ..--- .....-.- ...- ....-.-.- INTERFERENcE DEFINED ---.------------------------- APPLICATIONS UNDER EXAMINATION...........--........-- . COMMISSIONERS DECISoN- Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Incorporated, v. International Products Company, Canada's Pride Products Compa- ny, Inc., assignee, sub......... ................. DECISIONS OF TC BOARD OF APPEAli- E parte Braselton and MacLaren.---.--..-.-----..--.--.- DECISIONS OF THE U. 8. COURTs- Skinner Bros. Belting Co. e. Oil Well Improvements Co.- PATENT SUITS.....--..............................,...... DIscLArMERS.... - - --....................__......__....... . TRADE-MARKS PuIsED (140 ArruicATIoNs)........... TRADE-MARK REGISTRATIONs GRANTED...-..---..-...---....- TRADE-MAB REGISTRATIONS RENEWED....-..............- L AB ELS.-------- ----- __- __- __--- --------- -------- -------- PRINTS ---------......-.--..---..-.----...-....-.-.......--.-.- REISSUES--. - --.- - --..................-...................... PLANT P ATENT ---- .--------------------------- .----- .-- .- ...- D EsiG N s ....- .----- .--------------------- ..---------- .---- ...-- PATENTS GRANTED, -- - -----................................ Page 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5- 7 8 9 29 36 38 37 39 42 42 .68 Issue of December 6, 1932 Trade-Marks- -170-No. 2..,30 to No. 29.,55.. inclusive. T. M. Renewals. 13 Labels--------------No. 41,473 to No. 41,117, inclusive. Prints.--------------. 4-.o. 13,7 to No 13,78, lusive. Reissues.-----------12-No. 18,678 to No. 18,68 inclusive. Plant Patent--------1-No. 48 Designs-----------120-No. 28,403 to No. 88,612, inclusive. Patents ----------- 703-No. 1,689,739 to No. 1,820,441, inclusive. Total -..-.--. 1,058 Adjudicated Patents (D. C. N. Y.) Krueger patent, No. 1,1P4,752, for moistening device for gummed stickers and labels, claim 12 Held invalid and claims 14 and 15 Held valid and in- fringed. Better Packages v. L. Link A Co., 1 F. Supp. 132. (D. C. N. Y.) Finucane patent, No. 1,676,485, for leader-pipe strap, Held valid and infringed. Finucane V. Apes Gutter Hanger Corporation, 1 F. Supp. 223. (D. C. N. Y.) Krueger patent, No. 1,782,123, for pack- age sealer, claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 25, 28, and 30 Held invalid. Better Packages v. L. Link 4 Co., 1 F. Supp. 132. (D. C. N. Y.) Christman and Johnson reissue patent, No. 13,272, for piston-valve, claims 1 and 5 Held not In- fringed. Christman v. New York Air Brake Co., 1 F. Supp. 211. (D. C. N. Y.) Krueger reissue patent, No. 18,322, for tape serving device, claims 1-8 and 28 Held valid and in- fringed. Better Packages v. L. Link d Co., 1 F. Supp. 132. Interference Notices U. S. PATENT OriCa, Washington, Nov. 9, 1932. Aenne Harteneck, her assigns or legal representatives, take notice., An interference having been declared by this Office be- tween the patent granted October 6 193 No. 1,826,467, to Aenne Harteneck, 1. G. Farbenindustrle Aktiengesell- schaft, Ludwigshafen-on-the-Rine, Germany, and an ap- plication for patent filed by Leo -Wallerstein, care of Wall- ersteln Company, Inc., 171 Madison Ave., New York, N. Y., and a notice of such declaration sent by registered mail to said Harteneck at the said address having been returned by the post office undeliverable, notice is hereby given that unless said Harteneck, her assigns or legal repre- sentatives, shall enter an appearance therein within 30 days from the first publication of this order the inter- ference will be proceeded with as in case of default. This notice will be published in the OrICIAL GAZETTE for three consecutive weeks. WM. A. KINNAN, First Assistant Commissioner. U. S. PATENT OsrICE, Wtushing ton, NOV. 11, 1932., George G. Brown, his assigns or legal representatives, take notice: An interference having been declared by this' Office between an application for patent filed by George C, Brown, formerly of 1221 N St. N. W., and more recently of 1230 11th St. N. W., Washington, D. C., and an application for patent flied by Arthur Hungerford, 15 Dun Building, Buffalo, N. Y.. and the Office having failed to secure service on said Brown, notice Is hereby gi en that unless said Brown, his assigns or legal representa- tives, shall enter an appearance therein within 30 days from the first publication of this order the Interference will be proceeded with as in case of default. This notice will be published in the OrICIAL GAZErrE for three con- secutive weeks. WM. A. KINNAN, First Assistant Commissioner. Interference Defined RULE 93. An Interference is a proceeding Instituted for the purpose of determining the question of priority of In- vention between two or more parties claiming substantially the same patentable invention. In order to ascertain whether any question of priority arises the Commissioner may call upon any junior applicant to state in writing the date when he conceived the invention under consideration. All statements filed in compliance with this rule will be returned to the parties filing them, In case the applicant makes no reply within the time specified,- not less than ten days, the Commissioner will proceed upon the neasmp- tion that the said date is the date of the oath attached to the application. The fact that one of the parties has already obtained a patent will not prevent an Interference, for, although the Commissioner has no power to cancel a patent, he may grant another patent for the same In- vention to a person who proves to be the prior inventor. 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most