About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

332 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 1 (1925)

handle is hein.intprop/uspagaz0332 and id is 1 raw text is: Patents Nos. 1,527,967 to 1,528,745.
OFFICIAL GAZETTE
OF THE
Vol. 332-No. 1.                  TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1925.                      Price-$5 per year.
The OFFICIAL GAZETTE is mailed under the direction of the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing
Office, to whom all subscriptions should be made payable and all communications respecting the Gazette should be
addressed. Issued weekly. Subscriptions, $5.00 per annum; single numbers, 10 cents each.
PRINTED COPIES OF PATENTS are furnished by the Patent Office at 10 cents each. For the latter, address the
Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C.
CIRCULARS OF GENERAL INFORMATION concerning PATENTS or concerning TRADE-MARKS, PRINTS, and
LABELS will be sent without cost on request to the Commissioner of Patents. Washington, D. C.

CONTENTS.                            Page.
ISSUE  OF  MARCH  3, 1925 ......1...............................  I
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION ....................................  I
ADJUDICATED  PATENTS .......................................  I
ADVERSE DECISIONS IN INTERFERENCE ......................    I
NOTICE REGARDING PAYMENT OF FEES ......................     1
APPLICANT'S  ADDRESS ........................................  1
APPLICATIONS UNDER EXAMINATION .........................    2
PRELIMINARY REPORT OF SECRETARY'S COMMITTEE .........       3
DECISIONS OF THE U. S. COURTS-
American Druggists Syndicate v. U. S. Industrial Alcohol
Co  ......................................................  5
Oppenheim, Oberndorf & Company, Inc., v. President Sus-
pender Company  .......................................  5
PATENT SUITS .............................................. 6
INTERFERENCE NOTICES ......................................  8
TRADE-MARKS PUBLISHED (291 APPLICATIONS) ...............    9
TRADE-MARK REGISTRATIONS GRANTED ......................    49
TRADE-MARK REGISTRATIONS RENEWED .....................     65
LABELS             ----... -......................................  6
PRINTS ......  ..............................................  66
R EISSUES .....................................................  67
DESIGNS.................................................. 69
PATENTS GRANTFD .........................................76
Issue of March 3, 1925.
Trade-Marks ....... 335-No. 195,637 to No. 195,971, inclusive.
T. M. Renewals .....  37
Labels---------..   25-No.    28,345 to No.  28,369, inclusive.
Prints.............. 9-No.      7,841 to No.   7,849, inclusive.
Reissues ............  9-No.   16,009 to No.  16.017. inclusive.
Designs ............  35-No.   66,726 to No.  66,760, inclusive.
Patents ............. 779-No. 1,527,967 to No. 1,528,745, inclusive.
Total ......... 1229
Notice of Cancellation.
U. S. PATENT OFFICE, Washington, Feb. 8, 1925.
David Sabel, his assigns or legal representatives, take
notice:
A cancellation proceeding having been Instituted by
this Office upon the application of The Fisk Rubber
Company, of Chicopee Falls, Mass., to effect the can-
cellation of the trade-mark registration of David Sabel,
of 1472 Broadway, New York, N. Y., No. 111,542, dated
July 25, 1916, and the notice of such proceeding sent
by registered mail to the said David Sabel at the said
address having been returned by the post-office authori-
ties as undeliverable, notice is hereby given that unless
said David Sabel, his assigns or legal representatives,
shall enter an appearance therein within 30 days from
the first publication of this order the cancellation will
be proceeded with as in case of default. This notice will
1e published in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE for three consecu-
tive weeks.
KARL PENNING, Acting Commissioner.
ADJUDICATED PATENTS.
(C. C. A. Ohio.)          The   Bryant     patents, No.
1,153,481 claims 2, 5, and 7, and No. 1,153,482, for
driving connections between felly and rim of auto-
mobile wheel, Held invalid. Standard Parts Co. v.
Cleveland Welding & Mfg. Co., 2 F. (2d) 713.

(D. C. Pa.) The Wells and Hunter patent,
No. 1,363,200, for automatic printing-press feeder,
claims 17-22, Held valid. Miehle Printing Press &
Mfg. Co. v. Miller Saw-Trimmer Co., 2 F. (2d) 744.
(D. C. Calif.) The Lorraine reissue patent, No.
15,220, for device for separation of gas from oil
delivered from producing well, claims 17, 18, and
19 Held not infringed. Lorraine v. Townsend, 2 F.
(2d) 729.
(C. C. A. Ohio.) The Smith patents, Nos. 1,439,338
and 1,439,339, for a golf practicing and exercising
device, Held valid and infringed. Sandy MacGregor
Co. v. Vaco Grip Co., 2 F. (2d) 655.
ADVERSE DECISIONS IN INTERFERENCE.
In interferences involving the indicated claims of
the following patents final decisions have been ren-
dered that the respective patentees were not the
first inventors with respect to the claims listed:
Pat. 1,454,918, 0. Brophy, Fruit-juice extractor,
decided January 24, 1925, claims 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Pat. 1,471,010, J. N. Selvig, Spinning tool and ma-
chine, decided February 12, 1925, claims 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, and 14.
Notice Regarding Payment of Fees.
All fees must be paid In advance. Payment of money
required for Office fees must be made in specie, Treasury
notes, national-bank notes, post-office money orders, or
certified checks. Money orders and checks must be made
payable to the  Commissioner of Patents. Money sent
by mail to the Patent Office will be at the risk of the
sender. (See Rule 194.)
Certified checks, bank drafts, express and foreign money
orders must be immediately negotiable in this country and
for the full amount of the fee required by the Patent
Office. No allowance can be made by this Office for any
charge for their collection or exchange. Postage stamps
will not be accepted. Failure to comply with the above
instructions will cause delay.
Applicant's Address.
The requirement of Rule 33, that the post-office address
of the applicant must be stated in the petition, means that
the applicant must give the post-office address at which he
customarily receives his mall.
The rule was made In order that the Office in necessary
cases might correspond directly with the applicant and not
through his attorney. The address of the attorney with
Instructions to send communications to the applicant In his
care will not be accepted as a compliance with this rule.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most