About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

302 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 1 (1922)

handle is hein.intprop/uspagaz0302 and id is 1 raw text is: Patents Nos. 1,427,766 to 1,42S,.' 1. OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE Vol. 302-No. 1. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1922. Price-5 per year. Th. OFFICIAL GAZETTE is mailed under the direction of the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, to whom all subscriptions should be made payable and all communications respecting the Gazette should be addressed. Issued weekly. Subscriptions, $5.00 per annum: single numbers, 10 cents each. Printed copies of patents are furnished by the Patent Office at 10 cents each. For the latter, address the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C. CONTE NTS. Page. ISsUE OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1922 ................................. 1 ADVERSE DECISIONS IN INTERFERENCE ...................... 1 APPLICANT'S ADDRESS ........................................ 1 INTERFERENCE DEFINED ..................................... 1 CERTIFICATION BY THE SECRETARY OF TlE INTERIOR ....... 1 AMENDMENTS TO AMENDMENTS .............................. I CROSS-REFERENCES IN CASES RELATING TO SAME SUBJECT... 1 APPLICATIONS UNDER EXAMINATION .......................... 2 PATENTS GRANTED ........................................... 3 REISSUES ............................. 153 D ESIGNS ...................................................... 155 TRADE-MARKS PUBLISHED (156 APPLICATIONS) ............... 103 TRADE-MNARK REGISTRATIONS GRANTED ...................... 187 TRADE-MARK REGISTRATIONS RENEWED ..................... 196 LABELS ................................................. 197 PRINTS ....................................................... 198 COMMISSIONER'S DECISIONS- Ex parte Fesenmeier ..................................... 199 DECISIONS OF THE U. S. COURTS- Jessurun v. Peerless Light Co ....................... 200 ADJUDICATED PATENTS ....................................... 201 PATENT SUITS ............................................ 201 INTERFERENCE NOTICES................................... 202 Issue of September 5, 1922. Patents ............ 746--No. 1,427,766 to No. 1,42S,511, inclusive. Desig . 27-No. 61,432 to No. 61,458, inclusive. Trade-Marks .. 217-No. 15,37tLo No. 13S,557, inclusive. Labels ............. 43- o. 24,984 to No. 25,026, inclusive. Prints ............ 12-No. 6,293 to No. 6,304, inclusive. Reissues ........... 8-No. 15,442 to No. 15,419, inclusive. T. M. Rewewals... 20 Total .......... 1073 Adverse Decisions in Interference. PATENT NO. 1,385,187. On July 25, 1922. a decisicn was rendered that Philip W. Olson was not the first inventor of the subject matter covered by claims 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of his Patent No. 1,385,187, subject, Pencil, and no appeal having been taken within the time allowed such decision has become final. PATENT NO. 1,302,788. On July 21, 1922, a decision was rendered that Greaves and Etchells were not the first inventors of the subject matter covered by claims 1 and 2 of their Patent No. 1,302,788, subject, Electric furnace, and no appeal having been taken within the time allowed such decision has become final. PATENT -NO. 1,327,276. On August 4, 1922, a decision was rendered that Louis B. Hasbrouck was not the first inventor of the subject matter covered by claim 4 of his Patent No. 1,327.276, subject, Starters for internal-combustion engines, and no appeal having been taken within the time allowed such decision has become final. Applicant's Address. The requirement of Rule 33, that the post-office address of the applicant must be stated in the petition, means that the applicant must give the post-office address at which he customarily receives his mall. The rule was made In order that the Office in necessary cases might correspond directly with the applicant and not through his attorney. The address of the attorney with instructions to send communications to the applicant in his care will not be accepted as a compliance with this rule. Interference Defined. RULE 93. An interference Is a proceeding Instituted for the purpose of determining the question of priority of in- vention between two or more parties claiming substantially the same patentable invention. In order to ascertain whether any question of priority arises the Commissioner may call upon any junior applicant to state in writing the date when he conceived the invention under consideration. All statements filed in compliance with this rule will be returned to the parties filing them. In case the applicant makes no reply within the time specified, not less than ten days, the Commissioner will proceed upon the assump- tion that the said date is the date of the oath attached to the application. The fact that one of the parties has al- ready obtained a patent will not prevent an interference, for, although the Commissioner has no power to cancel a patent, he may grant another patent for the same in- vention to a person who proves to be the prior inventor. Certification by the Secretary of the Interior. By authority of an act of Congress approved August 2-1, 1912. (183 0. G., 507,) providing uniform charges for fur- nishing copies of records of the Department of the Interior and its several Bureaus, a fee of twenty-five cents will be charged by the Secretary of the Interior for every certifi- cate of authentication of official character-of the officials of the Patent Office. The fee thus provided should be paid to the Secretary of the Interior, and not to the Patent Office. Attorneys and inventors desiring such certificates are requested to remit the necessary fee to the Secretary of the Interior at the time of filing in the Patent Office an order for the copies desired. Amendments to Amendments. RULE 74. When an amendatory clause is amended, it must be wholly rewritten, so that no interlineation or erasure shall appear in the clause, as finally amended, when the application is passed to issue. If the number or nature of the amendment shall render it otherwise difficult to consider the case or to arrange the papers for printing or copying, the Examiner or Commissioner may require the entire specification to be rewritten. Cross-References in Cases Relating to Same Subject. RULE 43. When an applicant files two or more applica- tions relating to the same subject-matter of Invention, all showing but only one claiming the same thing, the appli- cations not claiming it must contain references to the application claiming It.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most