About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-419848.3,B-419848.4,B-419848.5 Jun 06, 2022 1 (2022-06-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaonmg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    U.S. GOVERNMENT   ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                                 DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                               The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                               a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
Decision                                       been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Guidehouse  LLP

File:     B-419848.3; B-419848.4; B-419848.5

Date:        June 6, 2022

Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Tara L. Ward, Esq., J. Ryan Frazee, Esq., Cara L. Lasley, Esq.,
and Adam  R. Briscoe, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester.
David S. Cohen, Esq., John J. O'Brien, Esq., and Rhina M. Cardenal, Esq., Cordatis
LLP, for Deloitte Consulting LLP, the intervenor.
Nicole S. Hutchinson, Esq., Paulina Valanty, Esq., and Jessica Chen, Esq., Department
of Homeland  Security, for the agency.
Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging awardee's alleged impaired objectivity organizational conflict of
interest (OCI) is sustained where the agency's OCI analysis was unreasonable, and
mistakenly focused upon whether the two work efforts were similar in size and scope
rather than whether the awardee would be in a position to review its own work.

2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of the protester's technical quotation is
denied where the assigned weaknesses  were reasonable, consistent with the stated
evaluation criterion, and adequately documented.

3. Protest challenging that the agency failed to evaluate whether awardee's prices were
unbalanced  is denied where the protester fails to make a showing that one or more of
the awardee's line item prices were significantly overstated and where the agency's
evaluation of the awardee's price was reasonable.

4. Protest challenging the agency's best-value tradeoff source selection decision is
sustained where the agency failed to adequately document or explain why the
awardee's technical advantages justified paying the price premium associated with that
quotation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most