About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299237 1 (2007-03-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaudn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                 Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This version has been approved
                                                     for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Hawkeye Glove Manufacturing, Inc.

          File:        B-299237

          Date:        March 6, 2007

          Marc Lamer, Esq., Kostos and Lamer, PC, for the protester.
          Vera Meza, Esq., and Srikanti Dixit, Esq., U.S. Army Materiel Command, for the
          agency.
          Peter D. Verchinski, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest by small business that agency improperly awarded small business set-aside
          contract to unreasonably high-priced offeror is denied where set-aside price was
          lower than government estimate and within range of small business prices received.
          DECISION

          Hawkeye Glove Manufacturing, Inc., a small business, protests the Department of the
          Army's award of a contract to Hatch Worldwide Imports under request for proposals
          (RFP) No. W911QY-06-R-0004, for combat gloves. Hawkeye alleges that the award
          was improper because the awardee's price was unreasonably high.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on February 22, 2006, contemplated the award of two contracts:
          50 percent of the requirement would be set aside for award to a small business, while
          the other 50 percent would be awarded on an unrestricted basis. Each awardee
          would receive an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a guaranteed
          minimum of 60,000 pairs of gloves, and a maximum of 250,000 pairs. The awards
          were made on a best value basis using five evaluation criteria: technical,
          management, past performance, price, and subcontracting plan. The technical
          criteria combined were significantly more important than price.

          Under the small business set-aside portion of the requirement, the agency received
          eight proposals, including Hawkeye's and Hatch's. The agency subsequently decided
          not to include Hawkeye's proposal in the competitive range because the firm's
          product demonstration sample was found to contain numerous weaknesses and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most