About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290575 1 (2002-08-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaogc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Demusz Manufacturing Company, Inc.

          File:        B-290575

          Date:       August 5, 2002

          Larry Harper for the protester.
          Howard Q. Bain, Esq., and Milton D. Watkins, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for
          the agency.
          Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
          General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Where request for proposals provided for evaluation of technical acceptability on
          pass/fail basis and selection of awardee from among those offerors whose proposals
          had been determined technically acceptable through application of a price/past
          performance trade-off, contracting officer reasonably selected awardee's technically
          acceptable, higher-priced proposal over protester's technically acceptable, lower-
          priced one where he determined that protester's price advantage was outweighed by
          its lower past performance rating.
          DECISION

          Demusz Manufacturing Company, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Dover
          Tool Company under request for proposals (RFP) No. F34601-02-R-0079, issued by
          the Department of the Air Force for stage 2 support turbine nozzles for the F1 10
          aircraft. Demusz contends that its proposal represented the best value to the
          government.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP in this procurement, which was set aside for small business, contemplated
          award of a fixed-price contract to the offeror whose proposal represented the best
          value to the government. Proposals were to be evaluated on the basis of technical,
          past performance, and price factors. The solicitation provided for the evaluation of
          technical acceptability on a pass/fail basis and for the selection of an awardee from
          among those offerors whose proposals had been determined technically acceptable
          through application of a price/performance trade-off. Past performance and price

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most