About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290415 1 (2002-08-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaofm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Vantex Service Corporation

          File:        B-290415

          Date:       August 8, 2002

          Simon Elliott for the protester.
          Ronald A. Kennedy for Kennedy Septic Tank Service, the intervenor.
          Parag J. Rawal, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest against agency's bundling of portable latrine rental services with waste
          removal services, each of which is classified under a different North American
          Industrial Classification System code and is generally performed by a different set of
          contractors, is sustained, where the agency has not shown that bundling the services
          is necessary to meet its needs.
          DECISION

          Vantex Service Corporation protests the terms of invitation for bids (IFB)
          No. DAKF40-02-B-0001, issued by the Department of the Army, Fort Bragg, North
          Carolina, for rental and servicing portable latrines at Fort Bragg, Fort Drum (New
          York), and Fort Campbell (Kentucky), and certain waste removal services at Fort
          Campbell. Vantex contends that the bundling of portable latrine rental and servicing
          with the other waste removal services at Fort Campbell unduly restricts competition.

          We sustain the protest.

          The IFB, issued as a total small business set-aside on March 29, 2002, contemplated
          the award of one or more fixed-price contracts for a base period with four 1-year
          options. The bidding schedule segregated the work for each facility under three
          separate schedules (I, II, III), and a fourth schedule (IV) that combined the work for
          all three facilities. The IFB permitted bidders to bid on a single schedule, a
          combination of schedules, or schedule IV (that is, all three locations), and provided
          for most advantageous to the government award(s), based on either the lowest
          bids from each schedule or the aggregate total of all schedules under schedule IV.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most