About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278904 1 (1998-04-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahqw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.



             Matter of: KRA Corporation

             File:        B-278904; B-278904.5

             Date:        April 2, 1998

             John E. Jensen, Esq., Daryle A. Jordan, Esq., and Thomas A. Duckenfield, Esq.,
             Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, for the protester.
             Paralee White, Esq., Michael A. Hordell, Esq., and Laura L. Hoffman, Esq., Gadsby &
             Hannah, for Walcoff & Associates, an intervenor.
             Gena E. Cadieux, Esq., Patricia D. Graham, Esq., and Joseph A. Lenhard, Esq.,
             Department of Energy, for the agency.
             Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST
             1. Agency evaluation of technical proposals is unobjectionable where the record
             establishes that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the stated
             evaluation factors; protester's mere disagreement with the agency's conclusions
             does not render the evaluation unreasonable.

             2. Protest that agency failed to perform proper cost/technical tradeoff is denied
             where source selection official considered technical evaluations, past performance
             ratings, and cost in his award determination and reasonably determined that the
             evaluated technical superiority of the six highest technic ally-rated proposals
             warranted payment of the cost premium associated with certain of these proposals
             vis-a-vis other lower technic ally-rated, lower cost proposals.
             DECISION

             KRA Corporation protests the Department of Energy's (DOE) decision not to award
             KRA a contract under request for proposals (RFP) No. DE-RPO1-97EI30000, issued
             by DOE for technical services for the Energy Information Administration (EIA).1
             KRA primarily challenges the agency's evaluation of KRA's technical proposal and
             the source selection determination.

             We deny the protest.


1EIA is an independent statistical and analytical agency within DOE.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most