About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277872 1 (1997-12-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagdx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Precise Construction Management

             File:       B-277872

             Date:       December 4, 1997

             Yogen Dalal for the protester.
             Christopher M. Bellomy, Esq., and V. Paul Clay, Esq., Naval Facilities Engineering
             Command, for the agency.
             Scott Riback, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest that agency improperly found bid nonresponsive is denied where bidder
             failed to acknowledge a material amendment; post-bid opening evidence showing
             intent to comply with the terms of the amendment cannot serve to cure an
             otherwise nonresponsive bid.
             DECISION

             Precise Construction Management protests the actions of the Department of the
             Navy in connection with invitation for bids (IFB) No. N63387-96-B-4582, issued for
             construction and landscaping work in San Diego, California. Precise maintains that
             the agency improperly failed to provide it with a copy of amendment No. I to the
             IFB and improperly rejected its bid as nonresponsive.

             We deny the protest.

             The IFB called for fixed-price bids to perform construction and landscaping work at
             the Navy's Murphy Canyon Housing facility. As part of the landscaping work, the
             IFB called for the installation of a sprinkler system and specified that certain
             equipment components were to be manufactured by a firm known as Calsense. As
             originally issued, the IFB also incorporated Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
             § 52.236-5, which provides that references to equipment by trade name or model
             number shall be regarded as establishing a standard of quality rather than as
             establishing a requirement for a particular manufacturer's equipment. Because the
             Navy wanted only Calsense equipment, however, it issued amendment No. I to
             clarify the solicitation. The amendment provided that, notwithstanding any other
             provision of the IFB, only Calsense irrigation equipment was acceptable.1


             1The amendment also made several other minor changes that for purposes of this
             protest are irrelevant.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most