About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-276271 1 (1997-06-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafxw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Einhaupl GmbH

             File:       B-276271

             Date:       June 2, 1997

             Reed L. von Maur, Esq., and J. Casey Fos, Esq., von Maur & Partners, for the
             protester.
             Nancy van Noortwijk-Sommer, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
             Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency properly rejected bid as nonresponsive that failed to include
             acknowledgment of a solicitation amendment that added asbestos abatement work
             not contemplated by the original invitation for bids and properly canceled the
             solicitation when it learned that it had failed to furnish the amendment to the
             bidder.
             DECISION

             Einhaupl GmbH protests the rejection of its low bid as nonresponsive and the
             cancellation of invitation for bids (IFB) No. DACA90-96-B-0045, issued by the United
             States Army Corps of Engineers, Transatlantic Programs Center, Europe, for
             construction and repair work.

             We deny the protest.

             The IFB was issued on August 23, 1996, for the repair of the ventilation system,
             utility lines, and exterior of a dining facility in Hohenfels, Germany, under a fixed-
             price, lump-sum contract. Among other things, the successful contractor was
             required to demolish the grid, metal, and acoustic ceilings, and to replace the
             existing roof and gables, both of which contained asbestos.1 Amendment No. 0001
             was issued to make various change and additions to the asbestos abatement work.
             Among these were the addition of Item 2.2.34, which required the removal and
             disposal of 783 square meters of cement asbestos ceiling tiles attached to the
             bottom of the building's wood trusses. Amendment No. 0002 was issued to make


             'The specifications described in detail the aspects and requirements of the work
             involving the removal of asbestos laden materials. The specifications described the
             ceilings as not containing asbestos, and the roofing sheets and vinyl floor tile as
             containing asbestos.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most