About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-271051 1 (1996-05-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaecn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: Interactive Communication Technology, Inc.

File:        B-271051

Date:        May 30, 1996

Victor Lim, Jr. for the protester.
Richard A. Marchese, Esq., Department of Housing & Urban Development, for the
agency.
Paula A. Williams, Esq., John Van Schaik, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office
of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Incumbent's proposal, which lacked detailed information concerning technical
approach and staffing, was properly excluded from the competitive range as not
having a reasonable chance of being selected for award in light of other, more
highly rated proposals received.
DECISION

Interactive Communication Technology, Inc. (ICT) protests the exclusion of its
proposal from the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP)
No. DU100C000018418, issued by the Department of Housing & Urban Development
(HUD) for audio/video production services. The agency excluded ICT's proposal
from the competitive range because it did not have a reasonable chance of being
selected for award due to numerous weaknesses identified in the proposal. ICT
contends that the agency's evaluation of its proposal was flawed and its proposal
was improperly excluded from the competitive range.

We deny the protest.

The RFP contemplated the award of a fixed-price, indefinite quantity contract for a
base year with 2 options years. The RFP set forth a best value evaluation scheme
with technical factors significantly more important than price in the source
selection decision. It advised offerors that technical proposals would be
numerically rated under four evaluation factors listed in descending order of
importance: qualification and experience, technical approach, quality control, and
creative and technical quality of sample productions.

Thirteen firms submitted initial proposals. An evaluation panel evaluated the
technical proposals and prepared a composite score for each proposal. Following


120524

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most