About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417111,B-417111.3,B-417111.4 1 (2019-02-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvrs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                          .......................................................................................................................
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Cognosante, LLC

File:        B-417111; B-417111.3; B-417111.4

Date:        February 21, 2019

C. Joel Van Over, Esq., Alexander Ginsberg, Esq., Meghan Doherty, Esq., and Kevin
Massoudi, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for the protester.
Marcia G. Madsen, Esq., David F. Dowd, Esq., Roger V. Abbott, Esq., and Luke
Levasseur, Esq., Mayer Brown LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., the intervenor.
Frank V. DiNicola, Esq., Tara T. Nash, Esq., and Desiree A. DiCorcia, Esq., Department
of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
Stephanie B. Magnell, Esq., and Amy B. Pereira, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the agency's price reasonableness evaluation is sustained,
where the record does not demonstrate that the agency evaluated final prices for
reasonableness.

2. Protest challenging the agency's award of a strength is sustained, where the
strength did not reasonably relate to the elements described in the solicitation.

3. Protest alleging that the agency conducted an unequal evaluation is sustained,
where the agency evaluated proposals using differing levels of scrutiny.

4. Protest alleging that the agency engaged in disparate treatment by failing to award
strengths to offerors equally for similar aspects of their proposals is denied, where there
were substantive differences between the proposals that did not warrant assigning the
same strength.

5. Protest alleging that the agency failed to evaluate the risk posed by the awardee's
lower labor hours under the fixed-price portion of the solicitation is denied, where the
solicitation did not require such an evaluation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most