About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-417161,B-417161.2 1 (2019-03-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadvqu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                    Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                               of the United States
                                           .......................................................................................................................
                                              DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                            The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                            been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Analytical Solutions by Kline, LLC

File:        B-417161; B-417161.2

Date:        March 12, 2019

Eric S. Crusius, Esq., Mitchell A. Bashur, Esq., and Amy L. Fuentes, Esq., Holland &
Knight LLP; and Cynthia Kline, Analytical Solutions by Kline, LLC, for the protester.
Uri R. Ko, Esq., Ellen Rothschild, Esq., and Alice M. Somers, Esq., Social Security
Administration, for the agency.
John Sorrenti, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Where a solicitation provides for two different types of certifications through which an
offeror may meet a quality certification requirement, protest challenging only one type of
certification as unduly restrictive of competition is dismissed.

2. Protest challenging solicitation as unduly restrictive because it requires offerors to
demonstrate experience through contract references under which they have performed
for two or more years is denied where the protester's argument is based on a
misinterpretation of the solicitation.

3. Protest challenging a solicitation term as unduly restrictive where the term limits
offerors to submitting only three contract references to show past performance is denied
where the agency has shown a reasonable basis for this limitation.

4. Protest that the agency engaged in improper bundling of contract requirements is
dismissed as untimely where the agency's intent to combine contract requirements was
apparent from the terms of the solicitation and the protester failed to challenge this
aspect of the solicitation until after the closing time for receipt of proposals.
DECISION

Analytical Solutions by Kline, LLC (ASK), of Cleveland, Ohio, protests the terms of
request for proposals (RFP) No. 28321319R00000004, issued by the Social Security
Administration (SSA) for information technology (IT) support services. ASK asserts that

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most