About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-414822.5 1 (2017-10-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtxq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has Decision been approved for public release. Matter of: Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. File: B-414822.5 Date: October 13, 2017 Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., Craig Smith, Esq., Moshe B. Broder, Esq., and Colin J. Cloherty, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester. Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq., David S. Black, Esq., Elizabeth N. Jochum, Esq., and Rodney M. Perry, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for Raytheon Company, the intervenor. Andrew Sinn, Esq., and Jaron Chriss, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency. Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging the agency's corrective action in response to an earlier protest is dismissed where the corrective action rendered the earlier protest academic and where the challenge is otherwise premature. DECISION Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH), of McLean, Virginia, challenges the terms of the corrective action undertaken by the General Services Administration (GSA) in response to BAH's protest (B-414822, B-414822.2, B-414822.3) of the issuance of a task order to Raytheon Intelligence, Information & Services, of Dulles, Virginia, under solicitation No. ID04160057 for services in support of the Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, Software Engineering Directorate. The protester contends that the agency's corrective action does not commit the agency to correct any alleged errors in the prior evaluation or award decision. We dismiss the protest because it fails to state a valid basis and is otherwise premature. BAH filed its initial protest on June 19, 2017, arguing that the award to Raytheon was improper; the protester also filed two supplemental protests. The protester raised the following three primary arguments: (1) Raytheon had an unmitigatable impaired objectivity organizational conflict of interest (OCI) that should have disqualified it from

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most