About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-412674.2,B-412674.3,B-412674.4 1 (2016-08-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsmh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                    been approved for public release.
         D e  c i s i o n                          - .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   TASC, Inc.

         File:        B-412674.2; B-412674.3; B-412674.4

         Date:        August 25, 2016

         Anne B. Perry, Esq., Townsend L. Bourne, Esq., and Derek R. Mullins, Esq.,
         Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, for the protester.
         Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Buckenmeyer, Esq., and Nicholas J. Surace,
         Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.; Kevin P. Mullen,
         Esq., and James A. Tucker, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for Vencore, Inc.; and
         Richard L. Moorhouse, Esq., and J6zef S. Przygrodzki, Esq., Greenberg Traurig,
         LLP, for CENTRA Technology, Inc., intervenors.
         Avi Baldinger, Esq., Elizabeth Jerke, Esq., and Arthur Passar, Esq., Central
         Intelligence Agency, for the agency.
         Paula J. Haurilesko, Esq., and Scott H. Riback, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest that the agency unreasonably assigned a deficiency to the protester's
         proposal for a resume that failed to meet minimum requirements is denied, where
         the agency evaluated the resume in accordance with the solicitation requirements.

         2. Protest that the agency's discussions were not meaningful is denied, where the
         protester introduced the deficiency in the firm's final revised proposal, and the
         agency was not required to evaluate resumes that were not specifically designated
         in the solicitation for review.
         DECISION

         TASC, Inc., of Chantilly, Virginia, protests award of contracts to Booz Allen
         Hamilton, Inc., of McLean, Virginia; Vencore, Inc., of Chantilly, Virginia; CENTRA
         Technology, Inc. of Burlington, Massachusetts; and Leidos, Inc., of Reston, Virginia,
         under request for proposals (RFP) No. 2013-13030800004, issued by the Central
         Intelligence Agency (CIA) on behalf of the Office of the Director of National
         Intelligence (ODNI) for advisory and assistance support services. TASC maintains
         that the agency improperly assigned a deficiency to its proposal, engaged in

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most