About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-409272,B-409272.2,B-409272.3,B-409272.4 1 (2014-02-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqef0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
Ac ca  ntabIIlty Int *of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         Decision                                  [...been approvedforpublic release.



         Matter of:   Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.

         File:     B-409272; B-409272.2; B-409272.3; B-409272.4

         Date:     February 25, 2014

         Rand L. Allen, Esq., Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Tracye W. Howard, Esq., Brian
         G. Walsh, Esq., and Jillian D. Volkmar Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester.
         David M. Nadler, Esq., David Y. Yang, Esq., Mary Kim, Esq., and Stephanie M.
         Zechmann, Esq., Dickstein Shapiro LLP, for Accenture Federal Services LLC, the
         intervenor.
         Ashley M. Bender, Esq., and Lori R. Larson, Esq., Internal Revenue Service, for the
         agency.
         Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest that agency erred in failing to downgrade awardee's technical proposal
         as a result of cost realism analysis is denied where the agency reasonably
         evaluated awardee's proposal and determined that an upward adjustment should be
         made to the proposed cost on account of unrealistically low labor rates, but that no
         downgrade of technical scores was necessary where the awardee's labor mix and
         technical approach were realistic and its low labor rates did not evidence a lack of
         understanding of the requirements.

         2. Protest that agency engaged in disparate treatment by assigning an exceptional
         strength to awardee's proposal but not to protester's proposal is denied where the
         record shows there were qualitative differences between the two proposals.
         DECISION

         Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH), of McLean, Virginia protests the Department of the
         Treasury, Internal Revenue Service's, issuance of a task order to Accenture Federal
         Services LLC, of Arlington, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP) No. 4054,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most