About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-408853 1 (2013-09-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadptx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




 G             A    O                                                   Comptroller General
        Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Controlled FORCE, Inc.

          File:        B-408853

          Date:     September 18, 2013

          Diana Grano, Controlled FORCE, Inc., for the protester.
          David L. Nimmich, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          K. Nicole Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          The Government Accountability Office lacks jurisdiction to consider disputes about
          infringement of intellectual property rights.
          DECISION

          Controlled FORCE, Inc., protests the terms of solicitation no. N40085-13-R-3314,
          issued by the Navy, for security guard services for Navy installations within the
          Navy's Mid-Atlantic region. Specifically, the protester argues the Navy is violating
          intellectual property laws by incorporating the protester's Mechanical Advantage
          Control Holds program into the solicitation requirements and Navy guidance.

          We dismiss this protest because we do not consider questions of intellectual
          property infringement under our bid protest jurisdiction.

          A patent or copyright holder's remedy for any alleged government violation of its
          intellectual property rights, resulting from a government procurement, is a suit for
          money damages against the government before the Court of Federal Claims. 28
          U.S.C. § 1498. See Diversified Technoloqies Almon A. Johnson, Inc., B-236035,
          Nov. 6, 1989, 89-2 CPD T 427, See also Wynn Baxter/Educational Training
          Concepts, B-1 97713, May 20, 1980, 80-1 CPD T 349. Additionally, original
          jurisdiction over trademark disputes lies in the district and territorial courts of the
          United States, not with our Office. 15 U.S.C. § 1121. Accordingly, our Office lacks
          jurisdiction to consider the issues raised in the protest.

          Susan A. Poling
          General Counsel

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most