About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-213789 1 (1984-05-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlsd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION       --LI      OF THE UNITED        STATES
                      ,  WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20548
                  &ITIl


FILE: B-213789                 DATE: May 18, 1984

MATTER OF: Jack L. Hamilton -- Restoration of Sick Leave


DIGEST:
       Employee was placed on involuntary sick
       leave after an agency physician found there
       were limiting conditions to the employee's
       continued employment in his assigned posi-
       tion. Claim for backpay and recredit of
       sick leave is denied since agency may place
       an employee on involuntary sick leave when
       medical evidence indicates that he is
       incapacitated for performance of his
       assigned duties.

       Mr. Jack L. Hamilton, a former Veterans Administra-
  tion (VA) employee, appeals our Claims-Group's denial of
  his claim for backpay and recredit of 2 days' sick leave
  used while he was placed on involuntary leave. For the
  following reasons, we affirm our Claims Group's denial of
  Mr. Hamilton's claim.

                             FACTS

       During his career with the VA, Mr. Hamilton sustained
  a succession of on-the-job injuries. In 1982, as a result
  of these injuries, Mr. Hamilton was suffering from prob-
  lems with his back. At that time, he was working as a
  painter, WG-9, at the VA Medical Center in Salem,
  Virginia. Following his most recent injury, which
  occurred on July 26, 1982, he was reassigned to temporary
  light-duty work in the Medical Center's laundry plant. On
  December 8, 1982, a fitness-for-duty examination was per-
  formed on Mr. Hamilton by an agency physician because of
  increased absenteeism from injuries and illness. On
  January 4, 1983, the VA personnel office received the
  results of this examination which showed limiting condi-
  tions to Mr. Hamilton's continued employment in his
  assigned duties as a painter. According to the adminis-
  trative report submitted to this Office by the VA, the
  agency filed an application for disability retirement for
  Mr. Hamilton on January 5, 1983. The next day, two
  officials from the personnel office met with Mr. Hamilton
  to discuss the results of the examination. The agency
  contends that because of Mr. Hamilton's inability to
  perform the duties of a painter, his pending application

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most