About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-209965 1 (1983-07-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlfn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                        0 .jF             c.1Z u:I Tr- 1T AT R U
                           -                     --






       FILE: B-209965                DATE: 'li >, 1983

       MA7T2R OF: Sadie G. Crawford




             Clai: for reimbursement of personal
             funds used to pay for repair of tele-
             phone answering system may be paid.
             Since the procurement of the repair
             services was authorized by superiors
             it would be unfair for the Government
             to retain the advantages of the ser-
             vices without repaying claimant.


     The Accounting and Finance Officer, Defense Logistics
Agency (DLA), Department of Defense has requested an advance
decision on whether he may certify for payment the claim of
Sadie G. Crawford, Supply Management Representative, Wright-
Patterson AFB, Ohio. The claim represents a $69.24 payment
by Ms. Crawford from her personal funds for repair of a
telephone answering system that she used in her assignment.
The claim may be paid for the reasons given below.

     The DLA telephone answering system in question, although
new, was out of warranty and inoperable. Claimant requested
and received authority from the DLA Operations Office to have
the system repaired. This authority did not give her authority
to enter into a contract, however, according to the submissions
to this Office. It appears that the claimant, a new employee,
was not advised that all charges were to be submitted through
channels and consequently paid for the repairs out of her
personal funds.

     In our recent decision 62 Comp. Gen._, B-206236, June 1,
1983, we said that where a Government employee uses personal
funds to procure goods or services for official use he or she
may be reimbursed if the underlying expenditure itself is au-
thorized, failure to act would have resulted in disruption of
the relevant program or activity and therefore satisfies the
test of public necessity, and the transaction satisfies cri-
teria for either ratification of the procurement or quantum
meruit if the contractor had not yet been paid by the employee.
That case also explained that a lesser standard of public re-
cessity may be applied when the employee was directed to take
the action at issue by a superior.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most