About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-205087.2 1 (1981-12-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjyw0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                - * - -     --  , _ .)---



                         DEISONTHE COMPTRCbLBRSGENERAI,
                   IECI!OI          .:.!   OF THE UNITE        BTATUB
                                       ''  WASH INGT.IN, D.C. 20 4 1



                   FILE;      B-205087,2         DATE; December 28, 1981

                   MATTER OF:       Valiant Sccurity Agency

                   DIGEST:


                      Request for reqonsideration is denied
                      because protester submits no facts or
                      arguments which were not considered
                      during review of initial protest and
                      no points of law on which a reversal
                      could be based,

                      Valiant Security Agency has requested reconiideration
                  of our decision Valiant SecurLty Agency, B-205087, Octo-
                  ber 29, 1981, 61 Comp. Gen,   ,81-2 CPD 367, where we
                  summarily dt'nied its protest without further development
                  because tle material submitted by Valiant, when read in
                  the light most favorable to the protester, affirmatively
                  demonstrated that it was not entitled to relief.

                       Section 21.9 of our Bil Protest Procedures, 4 C.F.R.
                  part P1 (1981), requires that a request for reconsidera-
                  tion *ontain a detailed statement of the factual or legal
                  grounds which allegedly warrant reversal of a decision
                  of our Office. As shown below, Valiant has submitted
                  no. facts or arguments which were not previously considered
                  and no points of law on which a reversal of our decision
                  could be based. We therefore deny the request for recon-
                  sideration.

                      According to Valiant, the low bidder on this procure-
                  ment for guard services was permitted to withdraw its
    '             bid on the basis that it had made a mistake. The con-
 I                tracting officer decided that Valiant, the second low
                  bidder, was not eligible for award because the firm was
                  owned by a Government employee add an award would con-
 .I               travene Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR) Q 1-1.302-3.
                 Award was made to the third low bidder at a price some
 *$20,000 higher than Valiant's, over the potential three-
                  year duration of the contract.
 Ii
 I.

 I

 1                        9
j   1.                *''- 7 '  . . jr-  ~ - -  .... .... . . . . .. * '-  - ' -- m
       ub ~ l .  .                                                       9 ~ ) W

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most