About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199060 1 (1980-07-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadikv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                           STHE  COMPTPOLLER GENEA,
    DE1CISiON               OF   THE   UNITED    STATES
                      S ~C -VSHGTN 7 0 C. 2 0 5



    FILE:  B-199060               DATE: July 22, 1980

    MATTER  OF:  Captain John H. VanderMolen, USAFR


    DIGEST:   Air Force member who successfully sues
              in Federal District Court for reinstate-
              ment to active duty and damages may not
              recover on an administrative claim for
              backpay in excess of $10,000 jurisdic-
              tional limitation of district court
              under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2).  Since
              claim filed concerns same parties and
              issues, including amount of damages,
              as decided by district court, doctrine
              of res judicata precludes considera-
              tion of this claim.

    -The question in this case is whether a claimant .who
successfully sues the Government in United States District
Court for backpay may then file an~administrative claim
and receive the amounts of backpay in excess of the $10,'00
jurisdictional limitation of the court under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1346(a)(2) (1976).  As will be explaine.d, the cl'aim
may not be paid.

     The question is submitted for an advance decision by
Ernest E. Heuer, Chief, Accounting and Finance Division,
Directorate of Resource Management, Headquarters Air Force
Accounting and Finance Center,- and concerns the claim of
Captain John H. VanderMolen, USAFR.

     The following recitation of the facts of this case
will only deal with those relevant to a resolution of
the question raised.  We note, however, that the factual
background leading up to the suit by Captain VanderMolen
can be found in Vanderbiolen v. Stetson, 571 F. 2d 617
(D.C. Cir. 1977).

     Captain VanderMolen brought suit in the United States
District Court claiming his February 19, 1971 discharge
from the Air Force was illegal and he sought reinstatement
to active duty and damages.  Since the claimant's alleged
period of wrongful discharge constituted a potential claim
in excess of $10,000, Captain VanderMolen waived recovery

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most