About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-196259 1 (1980-01-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhyc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL DECISION . OF THE UNITED STATES VVWASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 FILE: B-196259 DATE: January 28, 1980 MATTER OF: Truman L. Duhart - Retroactive Temporary Promotion and Backpay. DIGEST: 1. Civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force; serving in a WG-08 position claims retroactive temporary: promotion and backpay incident to performing higher graded duties of a WG-10 position. Claim is denied where employee has failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that he was officially detailed to the higher-graded position and that he performed the full range of duties of that higher-graded position. Mr. Truman L. Duhart requests reconsideration of his klaim for retroactive temporary promotion and backpa which was disallowed by our Claims Division on September 26, 1978. For the reasons which follow we are sustaining the adjudication of our Claims Division. Mr. Duhart, a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force, is claiming the difference in pay between prevailing rate positions established at WG-08 and WG-10 for the period April 1, 1975, through July 2, 1977. During this period, Mr. Duhart claims he was performing duties of the higher graded WG-10 position although he was assigned to a WG-8 position. His Civilian Personnel Office denied his claim on January 13, 1978, because there was no supervisory verification that he performed duties which could be allocated to the WG-10 level. Although Mr. Duhart's position was not audited during the period concerned, the Fiscal Year 1975, 1976, and 1977 personnel surveys conducted in his section all contained supervisory certification that Mr. Duhart's WC -U& position description was accurate. Subsequently our Claims Division disallowed Mr. Duhart's claim finding that he had failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that he had been officially detailed to a higher-graded position. In support of his present appeal, Mr. Duhart has submitted copies of facility work order sheets which appear to demonstrate the level of duties which Mr. Duhart performed during the.period of his claim. Mr. Duhart contends that the performance of these assignments evidences the fact that he was detailed to a WG-10 ge _ w3lo

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most