About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192261 1 (1978-09-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgkj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                         I                II





                                                 TH!  CrJMVPT~tI01f.Iff E.'NC-r4.4-L 4-
                      SE          \OFC 1iE U3lN\1lED                         fH±iF7     . STAT.B





                      FILE. B-192261                   D,CsTlE: Septem~bzr 18, 1978

                      MATTE    171F: Robert Yarnall RichiC Productions


                      D IE S T:

                  1.   Protes orz's lace proposal was properly rejected by agency notwith-
                       standin, that protester was advised by Postal Service one day
                       prior :-. date set for receipt of proposals that uire OL' express
                       mail would  low delivery at agency prior to deadline, In absence
                       of showing that proposal was misandled by agency after its
                       receipt.

                  2.   Failure to solicit an offeror in time-for him ro submic a timely
                       offer does not, absent showing o deliberate intent to exclude,
                       afford sufficient basis to question otherwina proper award.

                  3.   Award of contract while protest was pending is not inproper
                       where determination was made at higher level than contracting
                       officer in accordance with applicuble regulations.

                       Robert Yarnall .TLchie Productionq (Richie), protests the rejection
                  of its proposal by the Department of the Army,. Office of the Chief
                  of Engineers, under Request for Proposal (RFF) No. DACM 31-78-R-
                  0008. The basis of rejectio was that the proposal was received by
                  the contracting activity after the date set for the pening of
                  proposuls and that none of the circ*.mstances permitting .-onsickratlon
                  of late propobals were present as Lhown in paragraph 20 of the RFP.

                       The date and time designated for receipt of proposals was
                  established as 4:00 P.M. on June 8, 1.8. The Rirhie proposal was
                  sent at 11:00 A.M., June 7, 1978, by United States Postal Service
                  Express Mail Service, which guaranteed delivery the next day before
                  3:00 P.M. Richie's proposal was received by Government personnel
                  of the Army Corps of Engineers a.: 4:35 P.M., which was 35 minutes
                  late, and therefore was riot opened and considered.

                       RLchie alleges that an air traffic controller slowdown was
                  responsible for the late delivery, and that thc lateness is
                  attributable to agencies of the Government beyond the control and
                  negligence of'the offeror. Richie also states that it did not
                  receive sufficient time to prepare its proposal since the solicitation
                  date was M-ay 9, 1978, and it di,-d not receive the proposal until
                  May 19, 1978.













111                                                 pI

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most