About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189691 1 (1977-11-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfff0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

I


FiLE: B-189691


CATE:   Kovember 1. 1977


MATTER OF: Max R. Welton - Waiver of Uverpayments of Pay


DIGEST:


Reemployed annul tant was erroneously overpaid
because of agency's administrative error in
incorcctly  asallatIng the amoulnt of annuity
allocable to period of employment. Employee
was employed as consultant, worked irregula4r
number' of hours per pay period, ard paychecks
received varied greatly in amount. In such
circumstances reemploynd annuitant was not
put on notice that he was being overpid even
though Standard Forms50 issued upon appointment
indicated salary would be reduced by approximate
annuity allocable to period of employment. There-
fore, claim for overpayments is jalved under
aitnority of 5 U.S.C. 5534.


     Max R. Walton, e reemployed annuitant, appeals the denial by our
Claims Division of his request for wever of a claim against him by
the United States for recovery of $1,312.30 in erroneous salary pay-
ments.

     The record shows that Mr. Walton received a temporary appoint-
ment as a reemployed annuitant effective July 2, 1973 (not to cxceed
September 30, 1973), as a Manpower Resources Program Manager grade
GS-15, at a salary of $34,971.00'per annum, at the Picatinny Arsenal,
Dover, New Jersey. This appointnent was converted to an Excepted
Appo'intment-Intermittent effective September 30, 1973 (uot to exceed
September 29, 197A), as consultant, at $134.48 per dien.

     Under the terms of the appointment an amount equal to his
Civil-Service Commission retirement annuity was to have been deducted
from his salary. The employing agency made an erroneou estimate of
Mr. Walton's annuity and deducted that amount from his'reemployment
pay.  Therefore, erroneous overpayments of $1,312.30 were made to
the employee from July 2, 1973,through April 19, 1975. The erroneous
overpayments were discovered on April 18, 1975, when the agency
received verification uf Mr. Walton's annuity from the Civil Service
Commission.  The Finance and Accounting Officer at the Picatinny
Arsenal informed the employee of the erroneous payments by letter
of May 21, 1975.

     The United States Army Finance and Accounting Center determined
that Mr. Walton was at least partially at fault for not discovering


Lw


I


-----I


                             Tl   COMPTROLLEN UENERAL
DECISIC                      OP   THE UNITEn UTATEs
                             V/AurINo roN. 0.C . 20R410

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most