HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobadexg0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
DCCUMENT EESUME
02988 - [A2013092]
(Validity of the Army's Evaluation of a Technical Proposal].
B-188529. Jujy 14, 1577. 7 pp.
Decision re: Ken-Mar Machine and Health Eguipment Co.; by Paul
G. Detbling (for Elmer B. Staats, Comptrol.er General).
Issue Area: Federal Procurement of Goods and services (1900).
Contact: Office of the General Counsel: Procurement Law II.
Budget Function: National Defense: Department of Defense -
Procurement & Contracts,,(058).
Organization Concerned: Department of the Army: Army Armament
Materiel Enadiness Command, Rock Isl'ant, IL.
Authority: A.S.P.R. 2-501(i). AsS.P.L. 1-705.4. 4 C.F.e.
20.2(a). 53 comp. Gen. 357. B-182921 (1975). B-175305
(1972).
The protester questioned the validity of the evaluation
of its technical proposal. The protest that the evaluation
scheme was improper was untimely since it vas filed after
receipt of the technical proposals. I. would be improper to
reevaluate the protester's technical proposal as supplemented by
additional information developed by the protester during agency
debriefing and obtained throuqh an agency report submitted in
connection with the protest. (Author/SC)](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobadexg0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)