About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186035 1 (1976-11-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddyv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                             TH10  COIPTROLLEFR SWNERAL,
                          U I ICI11.,*0. CIF THE UNITED B1ATWS
                                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 201540



01FIILE:               B-186035                     DATE;    November  2, 1976

               MATTER or-t Edward .1, Jason - Settlement of Unexpired Lease


               DIGEST: Transferred employee executed contract for
                          release from unexpired term of 13 months
                          remaining on lease of rented apartment.
                          Although lessor retained sole Lpthority
                          to relet premises, Lince employee reduced
                          liability trom total possible rent of
                          $2,574 to $594, release constitutes reason-
                          able effort to settle rental obligation.
                          Employee, therefore, may be reimbursed full
                          cost of lcase settlement.

                   This  action is in rcsponse to a request dated Narch 4, 1976,
               from tF. Edwiu J. Fost, Chief of the Accounting Section, Office of
               the Cor itroller, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department
               of Justice, for a decision concerning a voucher submitted by
               Mr. Edward J. Jason, a DEA employee, for reimbursement of expenses
               incurred in setding  an unexpired lease at the time of  transfer of
               his official duty station.

                   The  record indicates that the claimant, Mr. Jason, was  trans-
               ferred from New York, New York, to El Paso, Texan, effective
               June 10, 1974.  Previously, Mr. Jason had exec'sted a rental agree-
               ment.in the amount of 4198 per month for an apartment in New York
               CiJlty for a term expiring on June 30, 1975. At the time of execut-
               :ing the lease, Mr. Jason paid to the lessor a security deposit of
               396.  It should be notzd that since the employing agency has
               utated the amount of the deposit to be only $198, it has appar
               :ntly confused the amovnt of the security deposit with  that of the
               tionthly rental obligation, Since a notation appearing on the
               claimant's March 28, 1975 memorandum of explanation to DEA Head-
               quarters ind4cates that the maximum amount we should pay is the
               security deposit ($198) + one months rent ($198), and since the
               amount claimed is equa) to the difference between the deposit
               paid by the claimant and the administrative error concerning the
               deposit amount, there appears only to be a computation error in
               this case, rather than a dispute concerning Mr. Jason's entitle-
               ment to reimbursement.  However, the agency also denied this claim


9

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most