About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-169490 1 (1976-02-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddrb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



4


DECISION





FILE:
       B-169490
MATTER OF:


DIGEST:


          ' THE   CGIVIRTRO&a   ER  GENERAL
  - *, OF THE UNITED STATES
        ./   WAS  HINGTON. D.C. 20548



                   DATE:      FEB 3  1976


Jack L. Wells - Request for reconsideration of
decision

1.  This Office will reconsider its
    decision if matorial cistake of
    law or of fact is alleged or
    proven.  Reconsideration is not
    possible, however, where decision
    recipient merely indicates general
    disagreement with the result reached
    in a decision.


               2.  Decisions of this Office are final
                   and conclusive on the executive
                   branch of the government. Thus,
                   President has no authority to review
                   a daisica  of his Office.

     This action is in response to a request for reconsideration
of our decision 3-19t90, October 9, l975o which sustaincd the
disallowance by our Tansportation a.d Claims Division of 1r. Jack E.
ells'  claim for reimursement of movin  epg. enses incurred incicent
to his transfcr from Okinawa to Anniston Army Lepot, Alabards, when
he was a civilian CploYee of the Dartment  of the Arm.Mr.   Wells
indicates disagreement with the conclusion reached in our prior
decision.  iowever, he points to no factual error and has cited
no legal precedent which would indicate a mistake of law.

     Mr. Wells states that by denying his clain this Office shows
discrimination against civilian govern-ment erloyees who accept
assignments abroad.  1hile Mr. Wells' feelin:s are understandable,
the limitations on reimbursement for moving expenses imposed by
5 U.S.C. 5724a(a)(4) (1970) must control. As we indicated in our
decision of October 9, 1975, Congress understood that this statute
would limit reimbursement for the moxving expenses of civilian
employees of the military to transfers in which both the old and
new station were located in the United States or in the other
territories and possessions referred to in the statute. Ve have
held that Okinawa is not one of these territories and possessions.
Accordin-ly, reimbursem-nt was not possible in Mr. Wells' case.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most