About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-182899 1 (1976-02-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddqw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






DECISION





FILE:  B-182899


       THE  CDIPTROLLEP GENERAL
J l)   OF   THE UNITED sTATES
  A  **WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




              DATE:  February 6, 1976


MATTER OF: Harding Pollution Controls Corporation


DIGEST:

     Allegations that contractor has failed to pass test
     requirement in contract and that therefore contract
     should be terminated involve matter of contract admin-
     istration which is function and responsibility of con-
     tracting agency and not for resolution under bid protest
     'procedures.


     By letter dated January 7, 1976, counsel for Harding Pollution
Controls Corporation (Harding) contends that the oil skimmer craft
specifications in the contract awarded to Marco Pollution Control
(Marco) under solicitation No. N00024-75-B-4208 issued by the
Department of the Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), are
not being followed.

     Harding previously had protested against an award being made
to Marco.  That protest was considered and denied. Harding Pollu-
tion Controls Corporation, B-182899, July 3, 1975, 75-2 CPD 17.

     Now, counsel for Harding has alleged that the belt used in the
Marco oil skimmer craft tested under the contract specifications did
not pass the test requirement and that therefore the contract should
be terminated.  This matter pertains to contract administration which
is the function and responsibility of the contracting agency. Matters
of contract administration are not for resolution under our bid protest
procedures which are reserved for considering whether an award, or pro-
posed award, of a contract complies with statutory, regulatory and other
legal requirements.  See Inter-Alloys Corporation, B-182890, February 4,
1975, 75-1 CPD 79.  However, for Harding's information, we have been
advised informally that Marco reran the reliability test referred to by
Harding infull  conformance with the terms of the contract and it was
completed sucdessfully.

     In view of the foregoing, we will not consider the allegations on
the merits.



                                Paul G. Dembling
                                General Counsel

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most