About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183532 1 (1975-08-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcpw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION           W         OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548




FILE: B-183532                     DATE:   Ag5,
                                           August 8, 1975
MATTER OF:       Information Consultants, Incorporated


DIGEST:

     Proposal to supply computer timesharing services initially
     considered within competitive range was properly determined
     technically unacceptable and no longer within competitive
     range where it failed required benchmark/live test demonstra-
     tion used to show that computer system would meet perform-
     ance specifications as determination whether proposal is
     technically acceptable is matter of administrative discre-
     tion which will not be disturbed where, as here, there is
     not clear showing of abuse. Moreover, possible lower cost
     of proposal will not be controlling where unacceptable
     technical proposal involved.

     On August 15, 1974, request for proposals (RFP) No. 5-35008
was issued by the United States Department of Commerce for the
procurement of computer timesharing services to be used by the
Social and Economic Services Administration (SESA). The closing
date for submission of proposals was set for September 16, 1974.
The procurement was reopened and the RFP amended on November 1,
1974, to provide for two changes in the specifications, and the
closing date was extended to November 29, 1974, at which time three
proposals were received. On January 23, 1975, a letter was issued
reducing the number of terminals required and requesting that the
best and final offers be submitted no later than January 31, 1975.

     The RFP as amended required that a benchmark run (live test
demonstration) be made on each offeror's system. Rehab Computer
was scheduled for a benchmark, but withdrew its proposal and a
benchmark was not conducted. The remaining two firms, First Data
Corporation, and Information Consultants, Inc. (ICI), the protester
here, were scheduled and had benchmarks conducted on their systems.
On December 18, 1974, First Data Corporation was benchmarked
successfully and was found to be in compliance with the RFP. The
benchmark for ICI was scheduled and conducted on February 3, 1975.
The report of the SESA technical committee dated February 24, 1975,
recommended award to First Data Corporation and stated that ICI's
deficiencies in meeting the requirement of the RFP, precluded its


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most