About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-404840 1 (2011-05-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbuk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


             D   ..
          Decision


          Matter of:  Analytic Strategies

          File:       B-404840

          Date:       May  5, 2011

          James R. Wimmer  for the protester.
          Janet N. Repka, Esq., and Marina M. Kozmycz, Esq., Department of Defense, for the
          agency.
          John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency's evaluation of the protester's proposed low price as posing performance
          risk was consistent with the terms of the solicitation and reasonably based where the
          solicitation sought specific cost and price information and provided for a price
          realism analysis, and the protester's labor rates were significantly below the agency's
          independent government estimate and the other offerors' proposed labor rates.
          DECISION

          Analytic Strategies, of Vienna, Virginia, protests the award of a contract to Defense
          Planning Corporation, also of Vienna, Virginia, under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. HQ0034-1 1-R-0008, issued by the Department of Defense, for analytical and
          information technology support services. Analytic Strategies protests that the
          agency's evaluation of its proposal and selection of Defense Planning for award were
          unreasonable.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued as a total small business set-aside, provided for the award of a
          fixed-price contract, with a base period of 1 year and four 1-year option periods.
          RFP at 38. The solicitation informed offerors that award would be made to the
          offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value to the
          government based upon the following evaluation factors: technical approach,
          personnel, past performance, organizational capacity, management approach, and
          price. RFP at 68, 71. The RFP noted here that the evaluation factors were listed in
          descending order of importance, with the exception of the organizational capacity

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most