About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-404275 1 (2011-01-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbqq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   AlL

A     ,   GA       O                                                  Comptroller General
        Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548

              D  ..
          Decision


          Matter  of: Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc.

          File:       B-404275

          Date:       January 24, 2011

          J. Jacob R. Peek, Esq., Driver McAfee Peek & Hawthorne, for the protester.
          Michael H. Saltalamachea, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Alyssa B. Weir, Esq., Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and David A. Ashen, Esq., Office of the
          General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Proposal found to include only a photocopy of the required bid bond was properly
          rejected as unacceptable.
          DECISION

          Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. (IMC), of Middleburg, Florida, protests the
          Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) rejection of its
          proposal and award of multiple award task order contracts (MATOC) to other
          offerors, under request for proposals (RFP) No. W912HN-09-R-0018, for design/build
          and construction work in USACE's South Atlantic Division. IMC asserts that the
          agency improperly found that the protester failed to include an original bid
          guarantee with its proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP contemplated the award of multiple indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity
          contracts, with a base period of 3 years with 2 option years, for design/build or
          construction-type work in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida,
          Alabama, and Mississippi. The RFP required offerors to submit a bid guarantee for
          20% of the bid price or $3 million, whichever was less. RFP at 24 and 142
          (incorporating Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 52.228-1). The RFP provided
          that the government would review the bid guarantee for legal sufficiency and that a
          bid guarantee found legally insufficient may render the offer ineligible for award. In
          this regard, the solicitation specifically cautioned that facsimile and photocopied bid
          guarantees were not acceptable. RFP at 24. Offerors were required to submit an
          original and one copy of Volume I of the proposal, which was to contain the required

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most