About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-400782 1 (2008-11-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaqs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: li AL A , GA O Comptroller General Acc untabiity * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 D .. Decision Matter of: CCITE/SC File: B-400782 Date: November 21, 2008 Cammy C. Ticknor for the protester. Maj. LaChandra C. Richardson, Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Frank Maguire, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Agency properly assessed relevance of protester's past performance submissions by applying criteria on an individual, contract-by-contract, basis--rather than applying criteria cumulatively, as protester argues agency should have done--where agency applied relevance criteria based on only reasonable interpretation of solicitation. DECISION CCITE/SC, of San Ramon, California, protests the award of a contract to another offeror under Department of the Air Force request for proposals (RFP) No. FA4427- 08-R-00 14, for medical support personnel at Travis Air Force Base, California. The protester principally contends that the agency misevaluated the relevance of its past performance submissions. We deny the protest. The RFP sought personnel for 10 different positions/employee classes, RFP at 3-30, and provided that award would be made on a best value basis considering three factors--technical, past performance, and price. Id. at 49. The past performance evaluation, the only part of the evaluation relevant here, was to be based on past and present efforts provided by the offeror and past performance information otherwise obtained by the government. Id. at 50. The past performance evaluation was to result in an overall performance confidence assessment of substantial confidence (exceptional or good performance survey results), satisfactory confidence (satisfactory results), limited confidence (marginal results), no confidence (unsatisfactory results), or unknown confidence (neutral results). An

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most