About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-292755,B-292755.2 1 (2003-12-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacync0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
 ....Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  American  Systems Corporation

          File:        B-292755; B-292755.2

          Date:        December  3, 2003

          Joseph G. Billings, Esq., for the protester.
          K. Lisa Daniel, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency reasonably rated proposal as marginal/high risk for technical factor under
          solicitation requesting proposals for training systems devices and curricula, where
          the proposal failed to provide sufficient details of its written instructional system
          development  processes and failed to provide sufficient details in its sample task
          response.

          2. Discussions were not misleading, even though, on the basis of an incorrect
          assumption, protester misinterpreted a particular discussion question, where a
          reasonably diligent offeror would have correctly understood, or requested
          clarification of, the agency discussion question.

          3. Agency reasonably made  one of the awards under solicitation contemplating
          multiple awards of indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts to an offeror
          whose  marginal proposal contained one significant weakness, but not to an offeror
          whose  marginal proposal contained two significant weaknesses under the same
          technical subfactor (with other aspects of the evaluation being relatively equal),
          where the agency reasonably determined this was a discriminator between the
          technical merits of the two proposals that justified award to one and not the other.
          DECISION

          American  Systems Corporation (ASC) protests the elimination of its proposal from
          the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. N61339-02-R-0063,
          issued by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, for training
          systems devices and curricula.


We  deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most