About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-292101,B-292101.2,B-292101.3,B-292101.4,B-292101.5 1 (2003-06-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyis0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
 -    -Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of:  AirTrak Travel et al.

          File:       B-292101; B-292101.2; B-292101.3; B-292101.4; B-292101.5

          Date:       June 30, 2003

          Josephine L. Ursini, Esq., for AirTrak Travel et al., and Lars E. Anderson, Esq.,
          J. Scott Hommer, III, Esq., and Benjamin A. Winter, Esq., Venable, Baetjer and
          Howard, for Alexander Travel Ltd. and El Sol Travel.
          Capt. Anissa Parekh, Robert E. Dudley, Esq., Maj. Art J. Coulter, and Raymond M.
          Saunders, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Attorneys' requests for admission to GAO protective order are granted,
          notwithstanding agency's objections, where the attorneys have provided evidence
          that they are not competitive decisionmakers for a client (or another relevant firm),
          which has not been rebutted by the agency.

          2. Solicitation for a fixed-priced contract to provide travel management services
          which required contractors to use developmental software did not place undue risks
          on offerors where the agency identified the performance uncertainties and provided
          sufficient information to allow offerors to intelligently prepare their proposals.

          3. Solicitation contemplating multiple awards to small businesses for travel
          management  services, which grouped the 87 nationwide locations into 28 travel
          areas, did not constitute improper bundling in violation of the Competition in
          Contracting Act of 1984, where the procurement approach was reasonably required
          to satisfy the agency's legitimate needs.

          4. Under a solicitation contemplating multiple awards for travel management
          services in 28 travel areas, agency, which provided general advice to the offerors as
          to what it would consider in deciding how many travel areas an offeror, apparently
          in line for award under these travel areas, would be capable of performing, is not
          required to furnish further precise details about how it would perform this aspect of
          the evaluation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most