About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-291620.2,B-291620 1 (2003-02-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacyfs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: I G A 0Comptroller General A- Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States General Accounting Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: SAMS El Segundo, LLC File: B-291620; B-291620.2 Date: February 3, 2003 William A. Roberts III, Esq., David M. Southall, Esq., Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Phillip H. Harrington, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding, for the protester. Eric J. Marcotte, Esq., and Scott A. Schipma, Esq., Winston & Strawn; and Mark R. Hartney, Esq., Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory, for LA Air Force Base SMC, LLC, an intervenor. John D. Inazu, Esq., and James A. Harley, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. General Accounting Office has bid protest jurisdiction to consider protest where, notwithstanding the concomitant sale of government real property, the transaction includes the procurement of property or services by the government. 2. Protest that contracting agency improperly evaluated selected offeror's technical proposal is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria. 3. Where solicitation provides for evaluation of past performance on the basis of projects completed within the 5 years preceding the closing date for receipt of proposals, agency properly elected not to consider selected offeror's past performance outside this 5-year period. 4. Protest challenging agency's source selection decision is denied where the record shows that the decision was reasonable and consistent with the stated best value evaluation criteria; the source selection authority reasonably determined that the proposals were technically equal, notwithstanding the assigned evaluation ratings, and that the selected offeror's proposal represented a lower overall cost to the government.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most