About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

093222 1 (1971-03-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacxbq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



              UNITED STATES  GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                           REGIONAL OFFICE
                         ROOM 7068 FEDERAL BUILDING
                         300 NORTH LOS ANGELES STREET
                      Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012

                                                      MAR1  2 1971


Rear Admiral T. J. Walker
Commanding Officer
Naval Air Systems Command
Navy Department
Washington, D. C.  20360

Dear Admiral Walker:

     We recently completed a survey of the pricing of negotiated
defense contracts at Douglas Aircraft Company, a division of McDonnell
Douglas Corporation, Long Beach, California.  The objective of our
survey was to review the procurement process and determine the extent
of compliance by contractor and Government personnel with the require-
ments of Public Law 87-653 and the implementing provisions of the
Armed Services Procurement Regulation (ASPR).  During our work, we
noted certain matters concerning the use of basic ordering agreements
(BOA's) and the timeliness of price negotiations which we are pre-
senting for your consideration and any action you may deem appropriate.

     Included in our survey were several orders over $100,000 awarded
to Douglas during the period July 1, 1968, to November 30, 1970, under
BOA's N00019-69-A-0011 and N00019-70-A-0004.  Considerable delays were
experienced in the procurement process for these orders.  For example,
an average of 9 months elapsed between the order issue and proposal
submission dates; also, an average of 13 months elapsed between the
order issue and negotiation dates.

     The major  factor contributing to the time lags appears to be the
utilization of  firm fixed-price orders to procure A-4 aircraft modifi-
cation kits which require  considerable developmental effort. Due to
the  substantial engineering and developmental effort required, the
contractor  deferred the submission of cost proposals to the Government
until this effort was essentially complete and a more sound basis
existed  for estimating production costs. This delay along with the
time  required to evaluate and negotiate the cost proposals resulted in
many  of these orders being negotiated after a substantial portion of
the  total effort had been completed.








                    50TH  ANNIVERSARY   1921-1971        -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most